In Reply to: there's an obvious alternative. posted by Jim Austin on November 1, 2016 at 18:38:53:
Hi Jim,If you've read any of the articles and posts, I've never commented directly about the "sound" of MQA because, for a long time now, I've asked for a proper comparison to be done in order to comment directly.
However, the one article I wrote about it asks a lot of questions from a more technical perspective. My background is computer sciences, which I studied in the 1980s and worked exclusively in from graduation to the late 1990s, which is when SoundStage! really got going. So from a technical perspective, there is a lot to talk about, particularly since there is material such as the patents, etc. I feel it's this kind of work audio writers should do.
Doug
Edits: 11/02/16
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Why not? - Doug Schneider 08:11:01 11/02/16 (42)
- RE: Why not? - Jim Austin 08:54:13 11/02/16 (41)
- Link to JAES paper - Michael Lavorgna 11:24:11 11/02/16 (1)
- Thanks Michael (nt) - Jim Austin 11:25:26 11/02/16 (0)
- On subjects other than MQA - Doug Schneider 09:24:34 11/02/16 (34)
- Not a question of space - Jim Austin 11:07:58 11/02/16 (33)
- RE: Not a question of space - Doug Schneider 15:29:16 11/02/16 (32)
- RE: Not a question of space - Jim Austin 15:46:41 11/02/16 (30)
- RE: Not a question of space - Doug Schneider 15:59:36 11/02/16 (29)
- RE: Not a question of space - Jim Austin 16:06:27 11/02/16 (28)
- RE: Not a question of space - Doug Schneider 16:14:09 11/02/16 (27)
- Sound On Sound... - Michael Lavorgna 16:42:10 11/02/16 (23)
- RE: Sound On Sound... - John Atkinson 04:35:34 11/03/16 (0)
- RE: Sound On Sound... - Isaak J. Garvey 17:14:53 11/02/16 (21)
- RE: Sound On Sound... - Michael Lavorgna 17:22:49 11/02/16 (20)
- RE: Sound On Sound... - Isaak J. Garvey 17:32:09 11/02/16 (19)
- Sound On Sound...I can't recall - fmak 08:45:55 11/03/16 (7)
- You clearly have not read... - Michael Lavorgna 08:54:22 11/03/16 (6)
- RE: You clearly have not read... - fmak 10:14:54 11/03/16 (5)
- Correcting you... - Michael Lavorgna 13:55:26 11/03/16 (4)
- RE: Correcting you...What is to correct - fmak 22:53:55 11/04/16 (3)
- "The definition of insanity... - Michael Lavorgna 10:04:54 11/06/16 (2)
- RE: "The definition of insanity... - SpotcheckBilly12345 10:17:05 11/06/16 (1)
- My welcome? - Michael Lavorgna 10:29:28 11/06/16 (0)
- How many threads... - Michael Lavorgna 17:40:38 11/02/16 (10)
- RE: How many threads... - Isaak J. Garvey 17:47:43 11/02/16 (9)
- Jsut curious... - Michael Lavorgna 17:59:14 11/02/16 (2)
- RE: Jsut curious... - Isaak J. Garvey 18:29:00 11/02/16 (1)
- RE: Jsut curious... - Michael Lavorgna 18:40:08 11/02/16 (0)
- RE: How many threads... - Michael Lavorgna 17:56:46 11/02/16 (5)
- Not paying attention - John Atkinson 04:31:39 11/03/16 (0)
- RE: How many threads... - Isaak J. Garvey 18:23:40 11/02/16 (3)
- RE: How many threads... - Michael Lavorgna 18:30:43 11/02/16 (2)
- RE: How many threads... - Isaak J. Garvey 18:39:38 11/02/16 (1)
- RE: How many threads... - Michael Lavorgna 18:41:27 11/02/16 (0)
- RE: Not a question of space - Jim Austin 16:16:56 11/02/16 (2)
- RE: Not a question of space - Doug Schneider 16:20:05 11/02/16 (1)
- RE: Not a question of space - Jim Austin 16:23:22 11/02/16 (0)
- RE: Not a question of space - Doug Schneider 15:45:05 11/02/16 (0)
- RE: Why not? - Doug Schneider 09:17:46 11/02/16 (3)
- RE: Why not? - Jim Austin 11:05:07 11/02/16 (0)
- RE: Why not? - Isaak J. Garvey 09:35:45 11/02/16 (1)
- RE: Why not? - Doug Schneider 09:38:58 11/02/16 (0)