In Reply to: RE: How about abuse of the word "review"? posted by fmak on June 21, 2016 at 03:46:26:
I think you misunderstand what the Greatest Bits designation actually is:There is a Class ranking of the Greatest Bits components which you could consider Recommended components.
The fact is, the designation of Greatest Bits is not given with the expectation of advertising. All you have to do is look at what has been reviewed and who is advertising. The editorial component of AudioStream is entirely separate from the advertising. I have never been told to give a good review to anyone by Michael. He is the only one I have ever communicated with at AudioStream.
I review because I love our hobby and for selfish reasons as well. I get to enjoy new components for an extended period of time-something that I could never do unless I was a reviewer.
I think you hit the nail on the head when you stated that perhaps you should listen to a product I rave about. That's all anyone should take from a rave review other then the factual information provided.
You and I have been going at it for over 10 years now. Here's to the next ten Fred.
Edits: 06/21/16
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: How about abuse of the word "review"? - Mercman 05:31:36 06/21/16 (8)
- Greatest Bits designation actually is - fmak 09:30:16 06/21/16 (7)
- Stereophile - you should ask the editor but. - fmak 21:50:49 06/21/16 (1)
- RE: Stereophile - you should ask the editor but. - Mercman 17:03:02 06/22/16 (0)
- RE: Greatest Bits designation actually is - Mercman 12:07:47 06/21/16 (4)
- You clearly - fmak 03:20:46 06/22/16 (1)
- RE: You clearly - Mercman 05:28:29 06/22/16 (0)
- RE: Greatest Bits designation actually is - David Pritchard 16:32:05 06/21/16 (1)
- Thanks David! Appreciated. (nt) - Mercman 16:51:37 06/21/16 (0)