|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Musical Fidelity V90-DAC rating posted by knewton on March 16, 2014 at 17:09:31:
>Perhaps, Mr. Atkinson, you would be kind enough to direct me to the
>correct explanation? I would appreciate it, thank you.\See, for example, the 2011 thread linked below. Basically, while some
companies are still humming and hawing about whether or not to send a
product to Stereophile for review, especially when they know it will be
measured, Antony Michaelson sends review samples without conditions,
and almost by return.
So when a reviewer finds himself without something to write about, as
happened with Sam Tellig's April column, where another product he had
been promised was delayed by a few weeks, there will always be Musical
Fidelity on hand.Yes, Antony Michaelson is gaming the system. And, of course, Sam Tellig
could have accepted that he didn't have anything other than Musical
Fidelity to write about for that issue and go without any income for a month.
I am sure the inmates on this forum would have done that. (Yeah, right!)
John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile
Edits: 03/17/14 03/17/14 03/17/14
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Musical Fidelity V90-DAC rating - John Atkinson 10:12:19 03/17/14 (2)
- "go without any income for a month" - did he get a bonus though, for declaring it Class A product? - carcass93 08:29:00 03/18/14 (1)
- No (NT) - John Atkinson 10:11:57 03/18/14 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
