I just received my April S'phile in the mail, and noticed again that Audio Research is rather conspicuously absent in virtually every category (with the exception of V60si mid-level integrated amp in the "integrateds" section). Of course my interest is somewhat biased (why else do people post to these threads?) in that I have had lower-level ARC products in my system since the early 1980s, but objectively from everything I have heard myself at demos, and seen in printed reviews in other publications, the ARC Reference series is very highly regarded in amps, pre-amps, phono amps, and even DACS. So I thought that to exclude ARC from all those categories, regardless of whether the reviewers felt they were "class A" or "B" or even "C" was odd.I know from previous threads that there is a specific reason that Magnepan products are excluded (ironically, of course, I use Maggies with my ARC components...) and don't want to re-open that debate. But I wondered if there is also a specific reason that ARC components aren't listed. (incidentally, on a related note, I'm also surprised that given all the debate over Class D amplifiers, the ARC DS225 and 450 amps have never even been reviewed. I realize that it is difficult to list a product as "recommended" if it is never reviewed - chicken & egg.)
- Pete
Edits: 03/16/12
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Topic - S'phile Recommended Components & Audio Research - palewin 07:18:04 03/16/12 (54)
- Yeah, and what about the amp section in general? - Dawnrazor 15:45:55 03/20/12 (2)
- RE: Yeah, and what about the amp section in general? - John Atkinson 20:44:32 03/20/12 (1)
- RE: Yeah, and what about the amp section in general? - Dawnrazor 21:42:14 03/20/12 (0)
- Some trends I see - Frihed89 01:00:59 03/19/12 (0)
- RE: S'phile Recommended Components & Audio Research - Bill the K 09:29:23 03/18/12 (0)
- The great TAS and Audio Research.. Why St'phile is not so hot on ARC - Elizabeth 17:05:17 03/17/12 (5)
- Also - josh358 17:15:34 03/18/12 (0)
- You're too young to remember .. - Dave Pogue 05:52:32 03/18/12 (1)
- Nah Not too young, just too forgetful! Yeah, first SS ARC sucked.. I do like my PH-2 though - Elizabeth 14:23:12 03/18/12 (0)
- "...ARC loaned stuff to TAS for eternities..." - plantsman 18:04:27 03/17/12 (1)
- LOL... Harry: "You can have it back when you pry it out of my cold dead fingers.." - Elizabeth 14:24:59 03/18/12 (0)
- RE: S'phile Recommended Components & Audio Research - John Atkinson 10:41:18 03/16/12 (1)
- RE: S'phile Recommended Components & Audio Research - palewin 10:57:34 03/16/12 (0)
- SP vs TAS Recs - mwhitmore 09:56:30 03/16/12 (12)
- Nor has Sound Lab - E-Stat 11:42:12 03/16/12 (11)
- Similar stories are legion - plantsman 15:58:43 03/16/12 (10)
- I remember one great party where the blender broke... - Jim Austin 06:53:13 03/17/12 (6)
- It 's a sad day for the industry - plantsman 07:05:35 03/17/12 (5)
- RE: It 's a sad day for the industry - Alan Sircom 14:00:39 03/18/12 (0)
- RE: It 's a sad day for the industry - Bill the K 08:31:22 03/17/12 (0)
- Cmon, get real. - Jim Austin 07:39:06 03/17/12 (2)
- Good comeback nt - Elizabeth 17:07:13 03/17/12 (0)
- Okay, you got me there - plantsman 07:46:47 03/17/12 (0)
- RE: Similar stories are legion - E-Stat 17:44:58 03/16/12 (2)
- Common factors - plantsman 02:41:31 03/17/12 (1)
- Correct on the first count -nt - E-Stat 05:42:48 03/17/12 (0)
- RE: S'phile Recommended Components & Audio Research - soulfood 07:43:30 03/16/12 (27)
- RE: S'phile Recommended Components & Audio Research - Pat D 09:36:17 03/16/12 (26)
- RE: S'phile Recommended Components & Audio Research - RGA 20:20:03 03/16/12 (20)
- RE: S'phile Recommended Components & Audio Research - josh358 17:39:41 03/18/12 (0)
- RE: S'phile Recommended Components & Audio Research - soulfood 20:51:55 03/16/12 (18)
- RE: S'phile Recommended Components & Audio Research - RGA 01:27:35 03/17/12 (17)
- That 1.7 review is nonsense - josh358 23:41:10 03/18/12 (16)
- RE: That 1.7 review is nonsense - RGA 01:24:03 03/20/12 (15)
- RE: That 1.7 review is nonsense - josh358 08:47:28 03/20/12 (14)
- RE: That 1.7 review is nonsense - RGA 20:00:22 03/22/12 (13)
- RE: That 1.7 review is nonsense - BenE 16:10:13 03/24/12 (9)
- RE: That 1.7 review is nonsense - RGA 02:36:09 03/28/12 (8)
- RE: That 1.7 review is nonsense - John Atkinson 13:17:51 03/28/12 (7)
- RE: That 1.7 review is nonsense - jimdgoulding@yahoo.com 20:21:47 03/28/12 (6)
- RE: That 1.7 review is nonsense - John Atkinson 05:30:51 03/29/12 (5)
- RE: That 1.7 review is nonsense - jimdgoulding@yahoo.com 06:35:00 03/29/12 (4)
- RE: That 1.7 review is nonsense - John Atkinson 10:51:01 03/29/12 (1)
- RE: That 1.7 review is nonsense - jimdgoulding@yahoo.com 13:05:54 03/29/12 (0)
- RE: That 1.7 review is nonsense - John Atkinson 09:49:38 03/29/12 (1)
- RE: That 1.7 review is nonsense - jimdgoulding@yahoo.com 09:57:41 03/29/12 (0)
- RE: That 1.7 review is nonsense - josh358 08:21:53 03/23/12 (2)
- RE: That 1.7 review is nonsense - John Atkinson 06:04:30 03/24/12 (1)
- RE: That 1.7 review is nonsense - josh358 08:10:36 03/24/12 (0)
- RE: S'phile Recommended Components & Audio Research - soulfood 10:53:39 03/16/12 (0)
- RE: S'phile Recommended Components & Audio Research - John Atkinson 10:42:37 03/16/12 (3)
- RE: S'phile Recommended Components & Audio Research - Tony Lauck 09:44:49 03/17/12 (2)
- RE: S'phile Recommended Components & Audio Research - John Atkinson 16:20:36 03/18/12 (1)
- RE: S'phile Recommended Components & Audio Research - Jallen 17:01:34 03/18/12 (0)