Home Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

RE: "It is wired into their subconscious and in the air they breathe"

I'm sorry you took a broad characterization of journalism generally (i.e. not confined to audio) as some sort of personal swipe. That wasn't my intent. While I may not be the most articulate writer in the world I would venture that reading my post as such was a considerable leap.

My friend's point, and I assure you that he is quite real, was that journalism, short of straight forward recounting of confirmed facts with no editorial comments, is inherently incapable of being unbiased and objective. It is by nature interpretive and the journalist will always bring his baggage (social, cultural, political, economic, emotional, etc.) into that interpretation. John Atkinson's measurements might have some claim to objectivity (I am not suggesting that they tell the whole story only that measurements, per se, can be relatively objective). Subjective reviews are inherently and inescapably biased. Any suggestion that a reviewer can completely wall off how he feels about the company, designer or importer completely defies both common sense and all available research. To offer another example of how bias can creep in example let us say that a reviewer is assigned to review a Dynavector DV20x2 but the reviewer has heard and was mightily impressed by the Dynavector DRT XV-1t. Would you really have us believe that that impression plus thoughts that "maybe I could afford/justify an XV-1t at half retail" never colors the review of the 20x2? The reviewer obviously is aware that a bad review of the 20 might cut off his access to accommodation pricing or an extended loan of a XV-1t. The intrusion of bias doesn't have to be a conscious process.

If we contrast audio journalism with a really good food/restaurant reviewer (yes, I'm well aware that most don't meet the following description), the food critic comes into the restaurant anonymously, pays for their meal at the same price everyone else pays (yes, they may expense the meal to the publication) and doesn't hang out with the cooks, servers or owner. In the best of all possible worlds the critic will also have some fairly serious cooking experience and/or training to inform their subjective interpretation. All this doesn't make the food reviewer objective but it at least reduces some obvious avenues for bias.

Until we can measure far better than we can today there will be room for subjective audio reviewers but claims of complete freedom from bias just makes the reviewing community look either rather simple or disingenuous. Speaking only for myself I tend to credence the comments of people who post here like Duke LeJeune, Bob Neill or Ozzy as much or more than most people with an (R) after their name in part because they make no claim to not being biased and make their biases quite public.


"There are political consequences to remembering things that never happened and forgetting things that did." Ariel Levy



Edits: 03/01/12 03/01/12

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  K&K Audio / Lundahl Transformers   [ K&K Audio / Lundahl Transformers Forum ]


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.