Home Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

RE: One of the problems with ezines...

>>>my point was merely that simply by virtue of having more than one guy at
>>>the helm is not automatic proof that it has walls to ensure honesty and
>>>ethics.
>>
>>No, but it is a better guarantor of ethical behavior than when the same
>>person both writes and/or edits the content and also sells the advertising.
>
>Your last sentence is laughable.

I don't see why? When the same person both writes and edits reviews and
sells advertising, then the conflict of interest is internal. His optimal behavior
as editor is in immediate conflict with his optimal behavior as as an ad
salesman. By contrast, at a traditional magazine with a "Chinese Wall"
between the editorial and advertising departments, the conflict between the
optimal behaviors is externalized, involves different people. Thus when the
editor has to make a decision that affects the advertising, while the publisher
or ad director may shout and curse at the editor, they don't outrank the editor
within the corporation and cannot force him to rescind that decision.

Do you really not comprehend the difference between these two situations?

I wrote about this in the article linked below. From that article: "A newspaper
can flout an advertiser...but if it alienates the buying public, it loses the one
indispensable asset of its existence."—Walter Lippman

John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile


This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  VH Audio  


Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups

FAQ

Post a Message!

Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.