In Reply to: The ethics of accepting products for review with the promise of advertising. posted by Analog Scott on February 22, 2012 at 10:49:22:
I just interpret his remark to mean despite the *potential* of getting ad $$ he sent the product(s) back and didn't review it/them.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I think you're overreacting 'cause of your low opinion of the guy. - Rick W 15:24:16 02/22/12 (17)
- RE: I think you're overreacting 'cause of your low opinion of the guy. - Analog Scott 16:45:50 02/22/12 (16)
- RE: I think you're overreacting 'cause of your low opinion of the guy. - jamesgarvin 17:14:17 02/22/12 (15)
- The thread initiated by theaudioscum@yahoo.com, aka - The Bored 19:55:42 02/22/12 (0)
- RE: I think you're overreacting 'cause of your low opinion of the guy. - regmac 18:45:15 02/22/12 (13)
- I think you... - mkuller 19:01:08 02/22/12 (12)
- I was hoping to get... - regmac 08:20:39 02/23/12 (11)
- I heard from a friend in the auto industry, ... - Jack Seaton 04:47:13 02/26/12 (0)
- RE: I was hoping to get... - DAP 13:06:59 02/25/12 (1)
- RE: I was hoping to get... - josh358 16:13:12 02/29/12 (0)
- Obsession or... - mkuller 10:45:35 02/23/12 (7)
- As I said, I’m merely curious. You, however… - regmac 16:59:41 02/23/12 (6)
- Wow, Reggie... - mkuller 18:23:40 02/23/12 (5)
- RE: Wow, Reggie... - regmac 19:50:57 02/23/12 (4)
- That Valin controversy... - mkuller 09:21:45 02/24/12 (3)
- RE: That Valin controversy... - regmac 10:35:56 02/24/12 (2)
- I haven't... - mkuller 15:46:30 02/24/12 (1)
- Poor Michael. Your problem is that you post so frequently you can't recall what you've written. - regmac 17:48:17 02/24/12 (0)