In Reply to: RE: Did anyone else read the BSG QOL review in TAS? posted by Tony Lauck on February 19, 2012 at 18:15:06:
In defense of the QOL, the volume difference was easily to hear so it was not deceptive. If the manufacturer was trying to be sneaky they might have designed in a more subtle volume difference ( say .5db difference).
I do agree that the remote controlled "bypass" button was not terribly useful, due to the lousy sound in bypass mode as well as the volume descripency.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Did anyone else read the BSG QOL review in TAS? - TubeDriver 19:59:57 02/19/12 (0)