In Reply to: RE: An Open Letter To Robert Harley posted by lord addleford on July 5, 2009 at 15:49:46:
>don't agree with the poster re magazines con game; the pov espoused is a
>tad cynical, conspiratorial and fatalistic.
Or in my words, "BS."
>my point was that when the reader comes upon a piece of 'dreck' writing,
>s/he has to confront and oppose the writer and editor in writing.
>otherwise, readers are left with no option other than passive consumption
>or merely voting with their feet.
I totally agree. Which is why I lurk on this and other boards. I look
for, and value, feedback on what Stereophile is doing right _and_ wrong.
John Atkinson
Technical Editor, Stereophile
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: An Open Letter To Robert Harley - John Atkinson 16:00:02 07/05/09 (1)
- RE: An Open Letter To Robert Harley - lord addleford 16:14:04 07/05/09 (0)