Home Critic's Corner

Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry.

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] Thread: [ Display  All  Email ] [ Critic's Corner ]
[ Alert Moderator ]

Here is one reason why most reviews are postive & still readable

I thought most reviewers only selected gear they liked for review, and then described in detail why they liked. Since most reviewers are at least experienced audiophiles, I see no problem with reading how an experienced audiophile used a particular piece of gear and why they like it. In fact it;s enjoyable to me to read about it.

I think most gear that is not upto it sonically just never gets reviewed. That's a screening process in itself, no?
I think some readers have expectations of reviewers who will trash gear, or rate it consumer reports style, but such reviewers after a while will never get any gear sent for review.

Grazie
-Amante

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
  Herbie's Audio Lab  

Follow Ups Full Thread
Follow Ups
FAQ

Post a Message!

 Forgot Password?
Moniker (Username):
Password (Optional):
  Remember my Moniker & Password  (What's this?)    Eat Me
E-Mail (Optional):
Subject:
Message:   (Posts are subject to Content Rules)
Optional Link URL:
Optional Link Title:
Optional Image URL:
Upload Image:
E-mail Replies:  Automagically notify you when someone responds.

[ Top Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]