In Reply to: Hanson seems to have unlearned some of the lessons in posted by bjh on April 7, 2007 at 19:15:30:
I think you may need to go back and re-read the article. Hanson freely admitted in the manufacturer's reply that he made a mistake in fuse size for the 2 ohm full power test. As I read it, the installed fuse should have and did blow. Hardly a failure of the protection circuitry.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Hanson seems to have unlearned some of the lessons in - Mike Currie 19:19:33 04/07/07 (15)
- So once again JA is the quality engineer... - vettracer 08:43:58 04/08/07 (9)
- Once again - Rufipennis 11:33:18 04/08/07 (7)
- who cares that an internal fuse blew? - vettracer 12:32:42 04/08/07 (1)
- If what you say is correct isn't the strawman JA's. After all - bjh 11:41:41 04/08/07 (5)
- Re: If what you say is correct isn't the strawman JA's. After all - John Atkinson 12:18:02 04/08/07 (4)
- I guess it's a good thing - bjh 12:41:46 04/08/07 (3)
- Obviously JA didn't test the other mono because it would likely have the same failure... - vettracer 20:23:00 04/08/07 (0)
- Re: I guess it's a good thing - Charles Hansen 14:55:11 04/08/07 (1)
- Re: I guess it's a good thing - Mike Currie 16:26:38 04/08/07 (0)
- Plus JA's measurement sections provide a slice of objectivity that shouldn't be ignored. nt - TomLarson 10:37:39 04/08/07 (0)
- I didn't see the manufacturer response so perhaps it - bjh 19:37:18 04/07/07 (4)
- Re: I didn't see the manufacturer response so perhaps it - Mike Currie 20:21:32 04/07/07 (3)
- I'm not going anywhere with it, it is what it is, if there's a problem... it's yours! nt - bjh 20:39:23 04/07/07 (2)
- No problem at all - Mike Currie 21:17:56 04/07/07 (1)
- Re: No problem at all - bjh 21:33:14 04/07/07 (0)