In Reply to: Re: Yeah, they've been seriously remiss in not reviewing ... posted by TomLarson on March 19, 2007 at 19:22:51:
The "nanny-ism" of CR never appealed to me, while the subject matter of TAS does. Not that it is anything other than entertainment, and I prefer Stereophile. Guess I'm just puzzled about why all this bums you (and others) so much. At 77, I discovered long ago that It Really Doesn't Matter.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Oh, I see a difference - Dave Pogue 04:48:40 03/20/07 (10)
- Re: Oh, I see a difference - Avocat 09:08:47 03/20/07 (9)
- A very thoughtful post - Dave Pogue 09:41:53 03/20/07 (8)
- Re: A very thoughtful post - TomLarson 09:55:04 03/20/07 (7)
- I think you have an enthusiast magazine confused with a Buyer's Guide. - robert young 15:27:15 03/21/07 (0)
- Well, you're the complainant here - Dave Pogue 10:13:10 03/20/07 (5)
- Re: Well, you're the complainant here - TomLarson 12:25:41 03/20/07 (4)
- If I really thought ... - Dave Pogue 12:31:31 03/20/07 (3)
- Re: If I really thought ... - TomLarson 13:07:27 03/20/07 (2)
- Your drive-by psychoanalyzing ... - Dave Pogue 14:03:31 03/20/07 (1)
- Re: Your drive-by psychoanalyzing ... - TomLarson 17:54:23 03/20/07 (0)