In Reply to: So how much $$ would it take to publish..... posted by Rick W on March 9, 2007 at 00:09:03:
Perhaps instead of setting up all that infrastructure , the reviewers could visit the listening rooms of the retailers and make assessments.Measurements will not be possible but we dont get to do any measurements when we go around auditioning.This will give real world results I think.This way the major expenses can be avoided and the subscription will be hopefully a reasonable amount.I wonder if this is a dumb suggestion! I recall paying $36 for a year of The Audio Critic in its first year of existence in the mid 70s when it had no ads.(Do I have to duck now!)There were very good reviews of Beveridge,Rogers,Quad,ML,Advent,DCM,Vandersteen,Electrocompaniet,Audio Research ,Bryston et al.Perhaps it will cost 5 times that much now for a similar no ads publication! Regards.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- A different approach..... - Bill the K 18:30:22 03/09/07 (4)
- Re: A different approach..... - Yoav 13:28:15 03/13/07 (0)
- An approach..... - mkuller 10:59:32 03/12/07 (0)
- Nope - Kal Rubinson 07:30:16 03/10/07 (1)
- Obviously! nt - clarkjohnsen 10:59:50 03/10/07 (0)