It's a Star Trek-ism (the old one) - andy_c

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Bye, bye TAS... - mkuller 21:10:47 03/04/07 (122)

Re: Bye, bye TAS... - tmartin 14:15:15 03/06/07 (62)

...truly sorry requires a PENANCE - PeAK 04:06:37 03/14/07 (2)

Re: ...truly sorry requires a PENANCE - jimmycj 20:20:56 04/08/07 (1)

Re: ...truly sorry requires a PENANCE - PeAK 16:55:47 04/15/07 (0)

Who reimbursed TAS? - eungkim67 15:47:14 03/09/07 (3)

The real story... - mkuller 10:36:07 03/10/07 (2)

"The real story..."? - bjh 12:32:00 03/10/07 (1)

Let's just say... - mkuller 13:22:16 03/10/07 (1)

Re: Bye, bye TAS... - TomLarson 11:48:38 03/07/07 (16)

I'm not trying to be an antagonist here, - Bruce Kendall 11:58:11 03/07/07 (15)

Re: I'm not trying to be an antagonist here, - TomLarson 16:18:59 03/07/07 (14)

no gifts, no accomodation will result in better reviews - jdouglas51 09:33:12 03/08/07 (2)

Re: no gifts, no accomodation will result in better reviews - john curl 13:58:24 03/08/07 (1)

Re: no gifts, no accomodation will result in better reviews - jdouglas51 06:24:17 03/09/07 (0)

no gifts, no accomodation will result in better reviews - jdouglas51 09:31:21 03/08/07 (1)

I agree. And that day doesn't sound like it's going to happen. nt - TomLarson 11:29:01 03/08/07 (0)

That is quite a mouthful. - Bruce Kendall 19:46:56 03/07/07 (4)

Re: That is quite a mouthful. - TomLarson 07:54:09 03/08/07 (3)

My interpretation of the explanation given is - Bruce Kendall 10:52:09 03/08/07 (2)

Re: My interpretation of the explanation given is - TomLarson 11:27:10 03/08/07 (1)

Thanks, Tom. - Bruce Kendall 11:46:30 03/08/07 (0)

Consumer Reports audio equipment reviews are for you...(nt) - mkuller 18:33:34 03/07/07 (3)

Re: Consumer Reports audio equipment reviews are for you...(nt) - TomLarson 11:42:06 03/08/07 (2)

Ahhh...youthful idealism... - mkuller 11:55:14 03/08/07 (1)

Re: Ahhh...youthful idealism... - TomLarson 16:23:18 03/08/07 (0)

There are really two issues here... - mkuller 10:41:48 03/07/07 (0)

I realize that Valin is a fiction writer of some note - Charles Hansen 19:25:32 03/06/07 (6)

Fiction writer of some note... - mkuller 15:09:29 03/07/07 (0)

Re: I realize that Valin is a fiction writer of some note - john curl 21:45:51 03/06/07 (4)

Re: I realize that Valin is a fiction writer of some note - Charles Hansen 22:05:25 03/06/07 (3)

I don't see you pushing the magazines to adopt - bjh 04:31:49 03/07/07 (0)

Re: I realize that Valin is a fiction writer of some note - john curl 01:35:47 03/07/07 (1)

Re: I realize that Valin is a fiction writer of some note - morricab 02:25:20 03/07/07 (1)

Re: Bye, bye TAS... - john curl 17:35:27 03/06/07 (28)

Chinese Whispers? - John Atkinson 04:15:11 03/07/07 (27)

Re: Chinese Whispers? - bjh 10:05:45 03/07/07 (26)

Re: Chinese Whispers? - John Atkinson 10:28:06 03/07/07 (25)

Re: Chinese Whispers? - John Atkinson 10:37:00 03/07/07 (0)

Re: Chinese Whispers? - Brian Walsh 10:35:35 03/07/07 (23)

Re: Chinese Whispers? - John Atkinson 12:49:19 03/07/07 (22)

Re: Chinese Whispers? - john curl 15:19:52 03/07/07 (21)

Re: Chinese Whispers? - Jonathan Scull 08:31:34 03/08/07 (0)

Re: Chinese Whispers? - John Atkinson 06:44:49 03/08/07 (19)

Re: Chinese Whispers? - john curl 12:47:55 03/08/07 (18)

Re: Chinese Whispers? - Jonathan Scull 14:07:55 03/08/07 (0)

The End of the Affair? - John Atkinson 14:05:23 03/08/07 (16)

Re: The End of the Affair? - john curl 14:43:18 03/08/07 (15)

Re: The End of the Affair? - John Atkinson 16:46:19 03/08/07 (14)

Re: The End of the Affair? - jamesgarvin 14:19:48 03/09/07 (1)

I admit it - nightdoggy 17:11:52 03/09/07 (0)

Re: The End of the Affair? - john curl 02:03:58 03/09/07 (11)

Re: The End of the Affair? - John Atkinson 08:49:15 03/09/07 (7)

John, a somewhat whimsical suggestion - Brian Walsh 19:23:28 03/09/07 (6)

It's a deal - John Atkinson 05:57:41 03/10/07 (4)

Re: It's a deal - Brian Walsh 17:49:55 03/10/07 (3)

Re: It's a deal - Charles Hansen 19:09:23 03/10/07 (2)

Re: It's a deal - Brian Walsh 19:29:01 03/10/07 (1)

Re: It's a deal - biased 22:27:00 03/13/07 (0)

Re: John, a somewhat whimsical suggestion - john curl 01:06:06 03/10/07 (0)

Best leave it... - bjh 05:08:12 03/09/07 (2)

Maybe listen to your own advice... - robert young 13:28:49 03/10/07 (0)

Re: Best leave it... - John Atkinson 14:15:21 03/09/07 (0)

It is helpful, and we all know stuff happens. - Bruce Kendall 14:27:07 03/06/07 (0)

Now thart Charlie's outed the offender.... - Bob Rex 13:58:00 03/06/07 (1)

Au contrair..... - mkuller 14:05:48 03/06/07 (0)

Regardless of the issue discussed below, I thought the - chris keating 06:16:55 03/06/07 (0)

What happened? - shamburg 05:48:07 03/06/07 (7)

This link is more cogent to the matter at hand. - Charles Hansen 09:08:35 03/06/07 (5)

Thanks, Charlie. But the question remainsâ€¦ - shamburg 09:31:41 03/06/07 (4)

Re: Thanks, Charlie. But the question remainsâ€¦ - Charles Hansen 10:35:37 03/06/07 (3)

Right on CH. - nightdoggy 17:28:01 03/09/07 (0)

Well, well, well... nt - clarkjohnsen 11:54:00 03/06/07 (1)

Three holes in the ground? ~t - three_sox 17:44:02 03/06/07 (0)

Here's a link to previous discussion here... - Ted Smith 08:41:09 03/06/07 (0)

Re: Bye, bye TAS... - jamesgarvin 14:09:46 03/05/07 (0)

Call me dense or something, - Bruce Kendall 11:08:25 03/05/07 (30)

Without coming clean . . . - markrohr 15:19:28 03/05/07 (15)

Nixon (OT) - Charles Hansen 20:32:07 03/05/07 (13)

Re: Nixon (OT) - regmac 08:17:39 03/07/07 (2)

Re: Nixon (OT) - Charles Hansen 09:20:38 03/07/07 (1)

Re: Nixon (OT) - Ozzie 11:04:58 03/08/07 (0)

Most historians would agree with you, Charles - David W. Robinson 21:47:21 03/05/07 (9)

Nixon: Guilty of "Mens Rea," but not of being the brains of the outfit. - John Marks 12:54:11 03/06/07 (4)

[RMN] was being manipulated and indeed set up." Hmmm... - clarkjohnsen 14:15:00 03/06/07 (3)

The military-industrial complex... - David W. Robinson 17:17:09 03/06/07 (2)

And where is Ellen Rometsch today? - John Marks 18:20:09 03/06/07 (1)

Rometsch in the news recently -- well, kinda... - clarkjohnsen 08:26:06 03/07/07 (0)

Jeez, don't you think that - markrohr 03:30:16 03/06/07 (3)

No, I do not... - David W. Robinson 08:51:14 03/06/07 (2)

Alas, such hysterics are - markrohr 09:44:50 03/06/07 (1)

We agree to disagree... - David W. Robinson 17:07:17 03/06/07 (0)

I agree there has to be some form of public cleansing. - Bruce Kendall 15:42:29 03/05/07 (0)

Re: Call me dense or something, - TomLarson 11:32:48 03/05/07 (13)

They've taken care ot it... - mkuller 12:00:17 03/05/07 (11)

Re: They've taken care ot it... - Charles Hansen 20:34:22 03/05/07 (4)

"Concrete galoshes" - andy_c 21:16:22 03/05/07 (3)

It's a regionalism. ;-) nt - markrohr 09:46:44 03/06/07 (2)

It's a Star Trek-ism (the old one) - andy_c 09:53:24 03/06/07 (1)

So it is! I used to know that. nt - markrohr 11:59:26 03/06/07 (0)

Re: They've taken care ot it... - theaudiohobby 12:11:16 03/05/07 (4)

Details... - mkuller 12:17:20 03/05/07 (3)

No you would be wrong, the article contained just, as the previous poster put it, chinese whispers. nt - bjh 14:32:59 03/05/07 (2)

Chinese Whispers? - John Atkinson 10:09:41 03/07/07 (1)

Re: Chinese Whispers? - bjh 11:20:41 03/07/07 (0)

Meanwhile... - newyorkp7 12:07:09 03/05/07 (0)

I'm a little less dense than I was before. - Bruce Kendall 11:46:39 03/05/07 (1)

Re: Bye, bye TAS... - Charles Hansen 22:19:23 03/04/07 (11)

Re: Bye, bye TAS... - Wendell Narrod 06:48:31 03/05/07 (10)

True, but... - John Atkinson 08:55:46 03/05/07 (9)

Re: True, but... - Wendell Narrod 11:24:46 03/05/07 (4)

Re: True, but... - John Atkinson 11:36:16 03/05/07 (3)

\\\given the wide circulation being given this matter///......... - three_sox 17:03:15 03/05/07 (2)

Re: \\\given the wide circulation being given this matter///......... - John Atkinson 03:52:16 03/06/07 (1)

Re: \\\given the wide circulation being given this matter///......... - three_sox 04:06:47 03/06/07 (0)

Re: True, but... - mls-stl 09:18:35 03/05/07 (3)

Glad not all general newspapers follow this line of reasoning. nt - TomLarson 10:54:38 03/05/07 (2)

Re: Glad not all general newspapers follow this line of reasoning.... - mls-stl 15:52:57 03/05/07 (1)

Re: Glad not all general newspapers follow this line of reasoning.... - TomLarson 17:39:22 03/05/07 (0)

Not the last - kavakidd 22:18:59 03/04/07 (3)

Re: Not the last - Charles Hansen 22:22:26 03/04/07 (2)

Re: Not the last - Craiger56 10:49:31 03/05/07 (1)

The Shadow knows! :) nt - bjh 14:37:08 03/05/07 (0)

Follow Ups

It's a Star Trek-ism (the old one) - andy_c 09:53:24 03/06/07 (1)

So it is! I used to know that. nt - markrohr 11:59:26 03/06/07 (0)