In Reply to: Re: Be careful what you wish for... posted by cfcjb on February 26, 2007 at 01:02:09:
standards?No reviewer's goal is to be a journalist. None that I've ever seen has claimed to be unbiased. Most reviewers, and some of what I consider to be "better" reviewers identify their biases as audio enthusiasts. Indeed, the last thing that we want are biased journalists claiming to be unbiased. Take a look at Dick Cheney's USA media, propaganda machine. Fox News and their like minded propagandists in USA, get the dubious distinction of being the second to the worst news media in the world.
Objectivity does not exist...
Come up to me with your 'what did you say?' and I'll tell you straight in the eye: DIY
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - Sordidman 10:48:13 02/26/07 (11)
- Re: Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - jamesgarvin 11:16:45 02/26/07 (10)
- like I said -t - Sordidman 16:06:35 02/26/07 (0)
- Re: Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - andy19191 11:37:33 02/26/07 (8)
- Re: Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - jamesgarvin 08:46:43 02/27/07 (4)
- Re: Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - andy19191 10:13:32 02/27/07 (3)
- Re: Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - jamesgarvin 13:40:06 02/27/07 (1)
- Re: Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - andy19191 01:50:30 02/28/07 (0)
- Wrong again! Your opinion does not constitute a fact. - Sordidman 12:09:05 02/27/07 (0)
- Re: Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - Jay 12:38:00 02/26/07 (2)
- Re: Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - andy19191 00:39:23 02/27/07 (1)
- in your opinion......... you can't have "misinformation" - Sordidman 12:02:50 02/27/07 (0)