Re: Be careful what you wish for... - cfcjb

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Art Dudley, Listening, Stereophile, March 2007 - bjh 20:53:55 02/24/07 (115)

I found his article a little sanctamonious... - cfcjb 16:28:17 02/25/07 (63)

I can't help but think... - mkuller 11:07:05 02/27/07 (5)

Suppose one drug costs your patients $20 and the pretty sales rep's similar drug costs $45? nt - Rick W 15:42:29 02/27/07 (4)

Re: Suppose one drug costs your patients $20 and the pretty sales rep's similar drug costs $45? - mkuller 09:54:33 02/28/07 (0)

Maybe in the 70's, but - Bruce Kendall 18:22:44 02/27/07 (2)

So...that's why Americans would be walking over the border to Canada for their prescriptions. - cfcjb 03:19:45 02/28/07 (1)

I'll give you a small touche for that, even though it is - Bruce Kendall 08:57:18 02/28/07 (0)

Reality... - John Atkinson 13:39:30 02/26/07 (24)

JA is a Gentleman....... - Bill the K 09:45:24 02/27/07 (0)

Re: Reality... - TomLarson 20:03:47 02/26/07 (0)

Re: Reality... - cfcjb 15:12:33 02/26/07 (6)

Re: You really need to start your own magazine.... - alan m. kafton 15:27:43 02/26/07 (5)

Re: You really need to start your own magazine.... - cfcjb 15:34:10 02/26/07 (4)

Re: There should be no quid pro quo.... - alan m. kafton 16:14:49 02/26/07 (3)

Re: There should be no quid pro quo.... - cfcjb 16:23:41 02/26/07 (2)

Re: I ain't laughing. [nt] - alan m. kafton 17:11:27 02/26/07 (1)

And here I was getting ready to offer to pay for his - Bruce Kendall 18:23:11 02/26/07 (0)

Perception - bjh 15:02:47 02/26/07 (8)

Reality (not Perception) - John Atkinson 16:31:02 02/26/07 (2)

"*A* Bass Ale"?! You show remarkable restraint, sir, nt - clarkjohnsen 11:01:29 02/27/07 (0)

Re: Reality (not Perception) - Charles Hansen 20:03:56 02/26/07 (0)

That's an awfully ambitious agenda you've got there! - Bruce Kendall 15:41:56 02/26/07 (4)

Voicing an opinion is not such an awfully ambitious agenda, is it? nt - bjh 19:24:52 02/26/07 (1)

Send me an email - Bruce Kendall 18:54:53 02/27/07 (0)

Yes... a *happy* hobby... girls, for instance... Uh oh... waitaminnit... nt - clarkjohnsen 15:59:19 02/26/07 (1)

No, no, that was an excellent suggestion. - Bruce Kendall 18:27:41 02/26/07 (0)

Er... - Steve Eddy 14:21:36 02/26/07 (1)

Back pack with wheels (NT) - John Atkinson 14:27:56 02/26/07 (0)

Re: You forgot to disclose.... - alan m. kafton 14:02:55 02/26/07 (3)

Re: You forgot to disclose.... - cfcjb 16:07:57 02/26/07 (2)

Re: No.... - alan m. kafton 16:12:51 02/26/07 (1)

Re: No.... - cfcjb 16:21:59 02/26/07 (0)

Re: I found his article a little sanctamonious... - hahax@verizon.net 21:04:07 02/25/07 (0)

Be careful what you wish for... - Charles Hansen 16:55:17 02/25/07 (30)

Re: Be careful what you wish for... - cfcjb 17:10:51 02/25/07 (29)

Not the New York Times - rbolaw 13:33:37 02/26/07 (1)

Re: Your reasoning.... - alan m. kafton 14:09:29 02/26/07 (0)

"no way any credible publication would allow it's writers to accept gifts or discounts..." Hmmm... - clarkjohnsen 09:50:43 02/26/07 (4)

Re: "no way any credible publication would allow it's writers to accept gifts or discounts..." Hmmm... - cfcjb 15:25:37 02/26/07 (3)

My point precisely: That contrary to your asssertion, "credible publications" do almost the same thing. nt - clarkjohnsen 15:53:34 02/26/07 (2)

Re: My point precisely: That contrary to your asssertion, "credible publications" do almost the same thing. nt - cfcjb 16:05:44 02/26/07 (1)

Look back: Your original word was "allow", not "do" -- pretty fine point there! In fact, none at all. nt - clarkjohnsen 10:57:01 02/27/07 (0)

Re: Be careful what you wish for... - Charles Hansen 17:50:13 02/25/07 (21)

Re: Be careful what you wish for... - cfcjb 18:22:29 02/25/07 (18)

Re: Be careful what you wish for... - Charles Hansen 20:18:58 02/25/07 (0)

Re: Be careful what you wish for... - Charles Hansen 20:09:03 02/25/07 (16)

Re: Be careful what you wish for... - cfcjb 20:33:46 02/25/07 (15)

Re: Be careful what you wish for... - andy19191 23:25:56 02/25/07 (14)

Re: Be careful what you wish for... - cfcjb 01:02:09 02/26/07 (13)

Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - Sordidman 10:48:13 02/26/07 (11)

Re: Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - jamesgarvin 11:16:45 02/26/07 (10)

like I said -t - Sordidman 16:06:35 02/26/07 (0)

Re: Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - andy19191 11:37:33 02/26/07 (8)

Re: Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - jamesgarvin 08:46:43 02/27/07 (4)

Re: Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - andy19191 10:13:32 02/27/07 (3)

Re: Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - jamesgarvin 13:40:06 02/27/07 (1)

Re: Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - andy19191 01:50:30 02/28/07 (0)

Wrong again! Your opinion does not constitute a fact. - Sordidman 12:09:05 02/27/07 (0)

Re: Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - Jay 12:38:00 02/26/07 (2)

Re: Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - andy19191 00:39:23 02/27/07 (1)

in your opinion......... you can't have "misinformation" - Sordidman 12:02:50 02/27/07 (0)

Re: Be careful what you wish for... - andy19191 03:21:07 02/26/07 (0)

Re: "Our policy is to always deliver the product to the reviewer in person." - cdb 18:21:00 02/25/07 (1)

Actually, it's not special at all. - Charles Hansen 19:31:37 02/25/07 (0)

I'd like to see EVERY reviewer do part of what Art did. - Rick W 09:04:15 02/25/07 (32)

Why just reviewers... - mkuller 12:31:28 02/26/07 (4)

Nobody said "just reviewers." - markrohr 16:22:37 02/26/07 (1)

Man, that's both dumb and ignorant. - Rick W 13:52:33 02/26/07 (0)

Are you implying that people should get this worked up over stuff that matters? - Bruce Kendall 13:13:05 02/26/07 (1)

Re: Ha! good one, Bruce.... - alan m. kafton 13:58:13 02/26/07 (0)

Dear Rick - John Marks 08:17:29 02/26/07 (8)

Re: Dear Rick - bjh 10:17:39 02/26/07 (0)

John, I think you've missed the point. - Rick W 10:17:02 02/26/07 (6)

Very good points Rick. - Ozzie 20:27:48 02/26/07 (0)

I actually cleared the decks - John Marks 17:24:00 02/26/07 (4)

I've got to ask you John... - Ozzie 20:30:43 02/26/07 (2)

OK - John Marks 08:01:58 02/27/07 (1)

15 foot pair of Stereovox .... - Sommovigo 19:39:10 02/27/07 (0)

John, you may be too sane (and artistically inclined) for hifi. - Rick W 18:40:19 02/26/07 (0)

Yeah but if they are dishonest to begin with, they'll just lie - nightdoggy 07:34:57 02/26/07 (0)

Answers - John Atkinson 06:45:37 02/26/07 (15)

Further Answers - John Atkinson 09:51:49 02/26/07 (9)

An Update - John Atkinson 07:41:59 03/06/07 (0)

Re: Further Answers - Charles Hansen 11:43:02 02/26/07 (5)

Trade-outs for latest... what is it?... Ayre Signature Series interconnects, - bjh 13:11:35 02/26/07 (3)

Re: Trade-outs for latest... what is it?... Ayre Signature Series interconnects, - John Atkinson 13:15:59 02/26/07 (2)

For bjh... - John Atkinson 13:37:01 02/28/07 (0)

You're welcome. nt - bjh 13:25:08 02/26/07 (0)

Re: Further Answers - John Atkinson 11:51:42 02/26/07 (0)

Yowza. I presume you live in a house or a very large apartment. - Rick W 10:56:17 02/26/07 (1)

My list is shorter - John Marks 18:01:39 02/26/07 (0)

Re: Answers - bjh 08:29:53 02/26/07 (4)

Equipment to Diet For - Jim Austin 11:04:22 02/26/07 (1)

Cute. :) nt - bjh 11:15:18 02/26/07 (0)

Re: Answers - John Atkinson 10:57:48 02/26/07 (1)

My advice to you... - bjh 12:48:26 02/26/07 (0)

Yes, that part of what he did I certainly agree with, that part! nt - bjh 09:36:25 02/25/07 (0)

I'll send you a bunny if you promise not to boil it. -t. - michaelavorgna 06:44:34 02/25/07 (10)

I had to explain that to a young person the other day... . - John Marks 18:03:22 02/25/07 (1)

Does she weigh the same as a duck? - michaelavorgna 06:31:56 02/26/07 (0)

He'd never do something like that! - Bruce Kendall 14:50:42 02/25/07 (1)

Re: He'd never do something like that! - michaelavorgna 06:35:44 02/26/07 (0)

I miss the bunnys - Kloss 07:37:47 02/25/07 (5)

Re: I miss the bunnys - michaelavorgna 06:50:18 02/26/07 (1)

I miss my bunny - nightdoggy 13:45:36 03/02/07 (0)

Here's one for you. - R Browne 23:07:47 02/25/07 (0)

What the world needs now... - Wellfed 20:53:33 02/25/07 (1)

\\\.What the world needs now.....is more bunnies to be sure. ///............. - three_sox 01:00:40 02/26/07 (0)

Re: Art Dudley, Listening, Stereophile, March 2007 - Doc Gaw 05:16:38 02/25/07 (2)

Quite right! nt - clarkjohnsen 10:45:35 02/25/07 (0)

Re: Art Dudley, Listening, Stereophile, March 2007 - TomLarson 07:58:54 02/25/07 (0)

Speaking of "peculiar, tortured logic." (nt) - Dave Pogue 05:05:54 02/25/07 (0)

Get a life...(nt) - mkuller 21:38:12 02/24/07 (2)

Are you suggesting.... - Sue Kraft 09:15:14 02/25/07 (0)

ZACKLY! - hifitommy 21:42:46 02/24/07 (0)

Follow Ups

Re: Be careful what you wish for... - cfcjb 17:10:51 02/25/07 (29)

Not the New York Times - rbolaw 13:33:37 02/26/07 (1)

Re: Your reasoning.... - alan m. kafton 14:09:29 02/26/07 (0)

"no way any credible publication would allow it's writers to accept gifts or discounts..." Hmmm... - clarkjohnsen 09:50:43 02/26/07 (4)

Re: "no way any credible publication would allow it's writers to accept gifts or discounts..." Hmmm... - cfcjb 15:25:37 02/26/07 (3)

My point precisely: That contrary to your asssertion, "credible publications" do almost the same thing. nt - clarkjohnsen 15:53:34 02/26/07 (2)

Re: My point precisely: That contrary to your asssertion, "credible publications" do almost the same thing. nt - cfcjb 16:05:44 02/26/07 (1)

Look back: Your original word was "allow", not "do" -- pretty fine point there! In fact, none at all. nt - clarkjohnsen 10:57:01 02/27/07 (0)

Re: Be careful what you wish for... - Charles Hansen 17:50:13 02/25/07 (21)

Re: Be careful what you wish for... - cfcjb 18:22:29 02/25/07 (18)

Re: Be careful what you wish for... - Charles Hansen 20:18:58 02/25/07 (0)

Re: Be careful what you wish for... - Charles Hansen 20:09:03 02/25/07 (16)

Re: Be careful what you wish for... - cfcjb 20:33:46 02/25/07 (15)

Re: Be careful what you wish for... - andy19191 23:25:56 02/25/07 (14)

Re: Be careful what you wish for... - cfcjb 01:02:09 02/26/07 (13)

Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - Sordidman 10:48:13 02/26/07 (11)

Re: Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - jamesgarvin 11:16:45 02/26/07 (10)

like I said -t - Sordidman 16:06:35 02/26/07 (0)

Re: Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - andy19191 11:37:33 02/26/07 (8)

Re: Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - jamesgarvin 08:46:43 02/27/07 (4)

Re: Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - andy19191 10:13:32 02/27/07 (3)

Re: Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - jamesgarvin 13:40:06 02/27/07 (1)

Re: Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - andy19191 01:50:30 02/28/07 (0)

Wrong again! Your opinion does not constitute a fact. - Sordidman 12:09:05 02/27/07 (0)

Re: Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - Jay 12:38:00 02/26/07 (2)

Re: Who said reviewers are journalists, subject to those - andy19191 00:39:23 02/27/07 (1)

in your opinion......... you can't have "misinformation" - Sordidman 12:02:50 02/27/07 (0)

Re: Be careful what you wish for... - andy19191 03:21:07 02/26/07 (0)

Re: "Our policy is to always deliver the product to the reviewer in person." - cdb 18:21:00 02/25/07 (1)

Actually, it's not special at all. - Charles Hansen 19:31:37 02/25/07 (0)