In Reply to: Seems like *you* need to read posts more closely. posted by Rick W on February 17, 2007 at 14:00:28:
I guess I can't help you out much here, as it seems you just want to be argumentative. JA's "As We See It" this month was concerning *all* of the rules that the magazine has. Enophile's post referred to Stereophile's "rules" and he said that didn't care about them and didn't need them.I was pointing out an example of what happens when a magazine doesn't have rules (or if they do, they certainly aren't enforced). I personally don't care for the resulting type of magazine, where the reviews are written by crooks and/or people that expect huge bribes. Maybe you do, I don't know.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Uhh... - Charles Hansen 15:02:49 02/17/07 (1)
- Can't help you either. Apparently you don't read the posts you reply to. nt - Rick W 16:04:58 02/17/07 (0)