In Reply to: Sam Tellig - Stereophile February 2007 posted by bjh on February 14, 2007 at 07:45:26:
his GOAL is to continue to fan the flames of complaints against him for continually writing about MF. The more folks complain about him writing about MF, the more he's going to continue to do it. MF also continually sends every single new product that they make to Sam, - immediately.
Whether or not you think MF makes high order junk, the greatest thing since sliced bread, or somewhere in between: be assured that Sam Tellig will continue to write about MF on a regular basis. This is not going to stop. And the more complaints that are posed, rest assured, there will be more time and space devoted to MF in his columns.
ST is certainly proof positive that Stereophile writers write what they want to write about.
Watching the reel as it comes to a close,
Brutally taking it's time,
People who change for no reason at all,
It's happening all of the time.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Of course, - this is perverse comedy to Sam - Sordidman 09:57:08 02/14/07 (19)
- Re: Of course, - this is perverse comedy to Sam - lord addleford 16:57:26 02/15/07 (2)
- Sam has made MF gear uncool - Kloss 05:39:08 02/17/07 (1)
- Re: Sam has made MF gear uncool - lord addleford 21:52:51 02/17/07 (0)
- wouldn't this compromise objectivity? - jdouglas51 15:14:29 02/14/07 (1)
- no objectivity in art -t - Sordidman 15:16:54 02/14/07 (0)
- "ST is certainly proof positive that Stereophile writers write what they want to write about." - Jay 12:30:45 02/14/07 (4)
- Indeed they do - John Atkinson 16:25:00 02/14/07 (3)
- Re: Indeed they do - Jay 20:11:18 02/14/07 (2)
- Re: Indeed they do - John Atkinson 04:07:07 02/15/07 (1)
- Re: Indeed they do - Jay 05:03:19 02/15/07 (0)
- "ST is certainly proof positive that Stereophile writers write what they want to write about" - bjh 11:06:14 02/14/07 (8)
- JA cannot be easily replaced because - nightdoggy 20:00:02 02/17/07 (0)
- Nope - John Atkinson 12:16:09 02/14/07 (3)
- Re: Nope - bjh 12:56:06 02/14/07 (2)
- You'll be waiting a long time! - John Atkinson 13:01:23 02/14/07 (1)
- HA HA LOL - nightdoggy 20:08:25 02/17/07 (0)
- I hear you - Sordidman 11:36:14 02/14/07 (2)