In Reply to: Re: Any examples of a critic criticizing another critic for publishing questionable theories or advice? posted by kerr on February 8, 2007 at 10:22:30:
I used the bizarre "advice" from non-critic Sprey because I didn't want to single out any real critic for my example, but I did want to show one example of bizzare audio claims.
.
.
.
Richard BassNut Greene
Subjective Audiophile 2007
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Not if you use an audiophile horseblanket ... and I happen to have some you may be interested in. - Richard BassNut Greene 08:27:49 02/09/07 (11)
- Sure...but first a question. - kerr 10:04:34 02/09/07 (10)
- "Not one of them that I listened to could have been bettered by a $100 speaker with good wire." Hmm... - clarkjohnsen 10:51:22 02/10/07 (9)
- Re: "Not one of them that I listened to could have been bettered by a $100 speaker with good wire." Hmm... - kerr 12:15:15 02/10/07 (8)
- And what was that "better wire"? nt - clarkjohnsen 12:20:58 02/10/07 (7)
- The Cardas Neutral Reference from my main rig - kerr 17:21:34 02/10/07 (6)
- Ah! Perhaps not the sort of *revealing* cable the writer had intended... nt - clarkjohnsen 12:20:19 02/11/07 (5)
- Which makes his claim using a less revealing cable all the more unbelievable (nt) - kerr 15:16:37 02/11/07 (4)
- I'd expect he'd have had a *better* cable. nt - clarkjohnsen 11:57:17 02/12/07 (3)
- But he was talking about Mapleshade so I guess not! (nt) - kerr 13:07:22 02/12/07 (2)
- I must be confused... nt - clarkjohnsen 10:29:00 02/13/07 (1)
- No more than usual (nt) - Richard BassNut Greene 14:27:15 02/16/07 (0)