In Reply to: A critic castigates the critics -- Excellent article! posted by clarkjohnsen on February 2, 2007 at 18:07:01:
And nothing that hasn't been written before by other audio reviewers. The most interesting aspect of the PF piece is why the author thinks he has to hide behind a silly nom de plume. He's not the White Rose Society facing death if his name is discovered by the authorities. I don't have a lot of respect for people who lack the courage to sign their names to their opinions.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- There's nothing particularly controversial in the article - Rob Doorack 05:50:38 02/07/07 (5)
- I didn't know I was SUPPOSED to be controversial ... I was just shooting for funny. - Dr. S 21:07:14 02/07/07 (4)
- Your aim isn't very good - Rob Doorack 06:43:25 02/08/07 (3)
- Re: Your aim isn't very good - Dr. S 13:56:39 02/08/07 (2)
- You don't seem to understand the difference between objective and subjective - Rob Doorack 08:09:13 02/09/07 (0)
- "You re-make some of my points about critics so eloquently." That's *priceless*, mon! nt - clarkjohnsen 14:23:13 02/08/07 (0)