In Reply to: Well... posted by Charles Hansen on February 3, 2007 at 07:20:38:
>>It was only after his speaker manufacturing fiasco that he lost >>his hearing. (Maybe he took too much oxycontin, like Rush >>Limbaugh!) After a hiatus (it seems like it was around a year or >>so), the reborn "Audio Critic" was a completely different animal -->>tedious, irrelevant, and pompous to the point of absurdity.As someone who has read very late copy of the Audio Critic, I simply cannot agree with your comments here. The reviews are much more substantive than what is obtainable in other magazines with the notable exception of the AudioXpress which geared to slightly different market. At any rate, I salute the courage of Colloms and Messenger for publicly acknowledging the severe deficit of critical commentary in todays audio journalism and applauding Peter Aczel' work as an example of critical audio commentary.
Music making the painting, recording it the photograph
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Well... - theaudiohobby 16:15:27 02/03/07 (10)
- Just out of curiosity... - Charles Hansen 17:17:26 02/03/07 (9)
- Re: Just out of curiosity... - theaudiohobby 14:47:53 02/04/07 (2)
- I'd suggest you consider elaborating since - bjh 17:03:54 02/04/07 (1)
- Re: I'd suggest you consider elaborating since - krabapple 15:43:59 02/09/07 (0)
- Issue #1... - mkuller 11:44:00 02/04/07 (5)
- Re: Issue #1... - john curl 14:19:39 02/04/07 (4)
- Re: Issue #1... - xaudiomanx@aol.com 19:17:25 02/04/07 (1)
- Speaking of nonsense... - mkuller 09:46:04 02/05/07 (0)
- Re: Issue #1... - John Atkinson 15:47:45 02/04/07 (1)
- Re: Issue #1... - john curl 00:46:52 02/05/07 (0)