|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
|
|
Critic's Corner Discuss a review. Provide constructive feedback. Talk to the industry. |
|
In Reply to: Do you ever tell the truth? Seems to me you were doing everything you could to try to embarrass me posted by Analog Scott on December 22, 2006 at 17:36:07:
Pat D:
"The null hypothesis may or may not be true, but Mr. Ricker hadn't proved it and it cannot be proven with statistics, either."Analog Scott:
"Actually it can to a given point of certanty. And the accepted level of certanty by science is 95%. Good enough for science, good enough for me."The 95% criterion is a common standard applied to the alternate hypothesis, that the things compared are audibly different. I have given you the URL for a very clear article on the ABX site which explains this, as well URLs or links to other relevant articles on the net. You show no signs of having read them, but here is the URL to the "ABX Statistics" on the ABX site:
http://www.provide.net/~djcarlst/abx_p9.htm
____________________________________________________________
"Nature loves to hide."
---Heraclitus of Ephesus (trans. Wheelwright)
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- No, I figured you were embarrassed enough. Have you figured out that one cannot prove two things to be the same yet? - Pat D 05:43:32 12/23/06 (11)
- Have you figured out that no one is buying your story? - Analog Scott 09:05:59 12/23/06 (10)
- I doubt you would admit to buying anything of mine. - Pat D 10:23:34 12/23/06 (9)
- You seem confused. do you know the difference between me and anybody?. - Analog Scott 11:05:50 12/23/06 (8)
- And ad hominem seems to be the entire substance of your arguments. - Pat D 14:03:19 12/23/06 (7)
- I'd say ad hominem seems to be the entire substance of your arguments. - Analog Scott 17:03:50 12/23/06 (6)
- Could you tell me about proving the null hypothesis. (nt) - Pat D 18:07:19 12/23/06 (5)
- Thank you for proving "ad hominem seems to be the entire substance of your arguments. " - Analog Scott 18:16:14 12/23/06 (4)
- No, the null hypothesis is substantive issue, and you refuse to tell us why you disagree with the statisticians. - Pat D 18:43:54 12/23/06 (3)
- No, the only issue is the fact that an honest answer from you would expose that old objectivist double standard - Analog Scott 09:02:22 12/24/06 (2)
- A side issue irrelevant to audio. Now, understanding the null hypothesis is important for understanding audio DBTs. - Pat D 20:08:45 12/24/06 (1)
- thank you for proving me right, again. - Analog Scott 09:37:12 12/25/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]