You might want to double check that list - Bob Rex

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Stereophile - Some Data - John Atkinson 07:05:01 01/24/06 (76)

Red Herring data -- perhaps correct, but not important - Richard BassNut Greene 09:09:24 01/27/06 (4)

More whining :-( - John Atkinson 09:32:29 01/27/06 (3)

What you call "More whining" is an explanation of why I no longer subscribe (& your "Julian Hirsch defense" is weak) - Richard BassNut Greene 07:23:47 01/28/06 (1)

Reviews... - Sommovigo 20:23:04 01/30/06 (0)

Re: "Otherwise, how do you explain why so many products from _non_-advertisers also appear on the list?" - Ivan303 11:40:36 01/27/06 (0)

Why has a sub branch been removed from this thread? - andy19191 13:23:35 01/26/06 (3)

Some comments - John Atkinson 06:49:46 01/27/06 (1)

Re: Some comments - andy19191 15:57:02 01/29/06 (0)

Re: Why has a sub branch been removed from this thread? - The Bored 16:40:49 01/26/06 (0)

What I wonder... - Rod M 19:09:56 01/25/06 (8)

I have heard stories - John Marks 16:53:12 01/27/06 (6)

Amen - John Atkinson 17:48:36 01/27/06 (5)

Back to the original!!!!! - awsmone@hotmail.com 01:37:49 01/28/06 (4)

Elvis shot JFK. Everybody knows that. - John Marks 05:57:10 01/28/06 (3)

Re: LHO shot JFK. Everybody knows that. - awsmone@hotmail.com 07:08:51 01/28/06 (2)

Less than half the story. - John Marks 07:52:50 01/28/06 (1)

I think u will find Connally was shot twice - awsmone@hotmail.com 09:48:16 01/28/06 (0)

When you're the biggest... - mkuller 13:38:52 01/26/06 (0)

Re: Stereophile - Some Data - Robert Deutsch 15:49:44 01/25/06 (0)

I doubt that the reviewers ... - jokekajr 06:58:40 01/25/06 (16)

Re: I doubt that the reviewers ... - Kal Rubinson 09:19:32 01/25/06 (15)

Re: I doubt that the reviewers ... - regmac 11:12:01 01/25/06 (14)

Why should Kal or Art or any of the writers care if someone advertises or not? - bwkendall 12:24:32 01/25/06 (9)

Re: Why should Kal or Art or any of the writers care if someone advertises or not? - regmac 12:58:10 01/25/06 (6)

Too much credit? - mkuller 13:49:20 01/26/06 (1)

Re: Too much credit? - jokekajr 12:09:34 01/30/06 (0)

Osmosis. Yeah, that's the ticket. (NT) - Kal Rubinson 13:10:20 01/25/06 (2)

Given the advanced age of Stereophile's staff - regmac 14:20:37 01/25/06 (0)

Don't try it, it makes you look green. -t - bwkendall 13:21:30 01/25/06 (0)

I "hear" you. - bwkendall 13:10:04 01/25/06 (0)

Yup. - Kal Rubinson 12:47:57 01/25/06 (1)

I didn't see it, - bwkendall 12:56:05 01/25/06 (0)

Depends on your list. - Kal Rubinson 11:53:01 01/25/06 (3)

Re: Depends on your list. - regmac 12:49:37 01/25/06 (0)

reviewers - jokekajr 12:45:03 01/25/06 (1)

Sure but...... - Kal Rubinson 12:51:52 01/25/06 (0)

Maybe it is time to get a subscription again - bschuchard@verizon.net 05:56:10 01/25/06 (0)

Re: Stereophile - Some Data - awsmone@hotmail.com 04:25:12 01/25/06 (0)

You might want to double check that list - Bob Rex 18:15:49 01/24/06 (2)

Re: You might want to double check that list - John Atkinson 03:49:43 01/25/06 (1)

let's push it back the other way.. - robert young 18:46:55 01/27/06 (0)

Aktinson is not Archibald (NT) - unclestu52 12:06:22 01/24/06 (1)

And neither is Atkinson (NT) - John Atkinson 13:33:21 01/24/06 (0)

".....but inmates seem unconvinced." - bwkendall 11:26:24 01/24/06 (9)

Re: ".....but inmates seem unconvinced." - Ivan303 15:59:56 01/24/06 (7)

The word is quid. So who might the Abramoff be - bwkendall 18:03:14 01/24/06 (4)

More Quo for your Quid... - Ivan303 18:36:20 01/24/06 (3)

$10?. - Rod M 19:47:39 01/25/06 (1)

Beats me. I pick up one free at CES every year... - Ivan303 21:02:41 01/25/06 (0)

But that's not the reality of how Stereophile operates - Sordidman 12:24:37 01/25/06 (0)

Thanks goodness for you there's .... Fox News (cough cough). nt - bjh 16:56:55 01/24/06 (1)

Faux News?........(gag, gag) - Ivan303 17:48:46 01/24/06 (0)

To paraphrase Nixon... - mkuller 12:42:40 01/24/06 (0)

Re: Stereophile - Some Data - Steve Eddy 09:51:54 01/24/06 (15)

2,561,908,347 - E-Stat 13:10:18 01/24/06 (5)

Re: 2,561,908,347 - bjh 13:17:46 01/24/06 (0)

True, - bwkendall 13:15:39 01/24/06 (3)

You are 99.9999% correct, sir ! (nt) - E-Stat 13:42:02 01/24/06 (2)

i have checked the statistics - hifitommy 17:55:21 01/24/06 (1)

Thanks for verifying that, tommy! -t - bwkendall 18:04:35 01/24/06 (0)

Re: Stereophile - Some Data - tcain 10:34:14 01/24/06 (8)

Love your quotation... - Wellfed 17:02:52 01/24/06 (2)

Re: Love your quotation... - tcain 18:02:51 01/24/06 (1)

Sounds delicious... - Wellfed 18:08:20 01/24/06 (0)

Re: Stereophile - Some Data - John Atkinson 10:47:19 01/24/06 (4)

Re: Stereophile - Some Data - Robert Deutsch 14:32:42 01/24/06 (0)

Wait up, isn't there a policy that - bjh 11:01:53 01/24/06 (2)

Not sure what your point is? - John Atkinson 11:54:39 01/24/06 (1)

No point, just wanted clarification on the qualification rules, Thanks. nt - bjh 12:33:50 01/24/06 (0)

Re: Stereophile - Some Data - Enophile 09:23:07 01/24/06 (3)

Bwaahahaha. Good one! tnwn - Pjay 12:24:55 01/24/06 (0)

My guess would be... - mkuller 10:49:06 01/24/06 (1)

I agree and would say that... - Ivan303 15:05:06 01/27/06 (0)

Re: Stereophile - Some Data - Bruce from DC 07:49:35 01/24/06 (2)

The Third List - John Marks 10:08:50 01/24/06 (1)

Re: "sorta like The Third Man" - Bruce from DC 11:15:52 01/26/06 (0)

Follow Ups

You might want to double check that list - Bob Rex 18:15:49 01/24/06 (2)

Re: You might want to double check that list - John Atkinson 03:49:43 01/25/06 (1)

let's push it back the other way.. - robert young 18:46:55 01/27/06 (0)