|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
|
|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
In Reply to: I have different experience posted by KKM on February 4, 2006 at 08:22:24:
I have always found that the amplifier was more the reason for the degree of unraveling of the complexity of the source material, as well as, to a lesser degree the other front-end equipment (including cabling). I even noticed this quality with my old MG-1Bs, especially with tube amps versus the mid-fi solid state amps. I would blame the Maggies only to find that amp/speaker matching to be the critical element. The Maggies remain at the top, in my experience, when it comes to allowing the user to discern nuances between different components. Mine you, I have only heard the Gallos in a very brief session and I don't remember any impressions one way or another. Thus, I am not in a position to deny the comparison you state you heard. I have, though, experienced setups where I thought I had pinned down limitations of the Maggies only to find that the limitations I had attributed to the speaker were indeed caused by other factors.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- I do respect your feelings in reaching your conclusions, but . . . - Alan G. 18:06:20 02/04/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
