In Reply to: it is the mutual inductance that's responsible for keeping the inductance posted by Mart on April 28, 2002 at 19:41:15:
There's not enough mutual inductance to couple the two well enough to yield the original inductance value. What you'll end up with is a value somewhere between L and L/2....(depending upon the coupling amount.)Lowering DCR usually has benefits, but doing it this way is highly experimental, and probably not recommended for those not technically inclined.
It's certainly not going to damage anything, but it will change the sound of the speaker. For better or worse.
Regards,
Davey.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: it is the mutual inductance that's responsible for keeping the inductance - Davey 20:45:25 04/28/02 (18)
- granted but ... - Mart 00:50:20 04/29/02 (17)
- Re: granted but ... - Davey 06:54:04 04/29/02 (16)
- how tightly were they bound? - Mart 07:13:55 04/29/02 (15)
- Re: how tightly were they bound? - s.hum 10:16:07 04/29/02 (2)
- after contemplation - Mart 16:56:32 04/29/02 (1)
- Re: after contemplation - s.hum 17:51:49 04/29/02 (0)
- Re: how tightly were they bound? - Davey 09:36:14 04/29/02 (11)
- just did a model - Mart 01:15:25 04/30/02 (8)
- Re: just did a model - Davey 06:37:38 04/30/02 (7)
- IME still not nearly as audible as Q - Mart 07:40:52 04/30/02 (6)
- Re: IME still not nearly as audible as Q - s.hum 08:56:32 04/30/02 (5)
- Re: IME still not nearly as audible as Q - Mart 10:54:34 04/30/02 (4)
- Either or then? - s.hum 11:33:53 04/30/02 (3)
- Re: Either or then? - Mart 11:55:44 04/30/02 (2)
- Re: Either or then? - s.hum 13:33:11 04/30/02 (1)
- "is this a good thing?" - Mart 16:07:22 04/30/02 (0)
- so, yours weren't bound at all? - Mart 11:53:51 04/29/02 (0)
- re: capacitance - Mart 11:03:16 04/29/02 (0)