Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Double Inductor Mod - s.hum 12:26:22 04/28/02 (28)

• I've been following this thread with great interest... - EdG 08:05:11 05/01/02 (1)
• Re: I've been following this thread with great interest... - s.hum 11:27:26 05/01/02 (0)
• the picture - Mart 18:26:48 04/28/02 (25)
• Re: the picture - monk1 08:27:21 04/29/02 (3)
• coil capacitance - Arbelos 13:48:49 04/29/02 (1)
• Re: coil capacitance - monk1 10:42:46 05/01/02 (0)
• no one I know measured it - Mart 11:23:43 04/29/02 (0)
• Re: the picture - Davey 18:44:15 04/28/02 (20)
• it is the mutual inductance that's responsible for keeping the inductance - Mart 19:41:15 04/28/02 (19)
• Re: it is the mutual inductance that's responsible for keeping the inductance - Davey 20:45:25 04/28/02 (18)
• granted but ... - Mart 00:50:20 04/29/02 (17)
• Re: granted but ... - Davey 06:54:04 04/29/02 (16)
• how tightly were they bound? - Mart 07:13:55 04/29/02 (15)
• Re: how tightly were they bound? - s.hum 10:16:07 04/29/02 (2)
• after contemplation - Mart 16:56:32 04/29/02 (1)
• Re: after contemplation - s.hum 17:51:49 04/29/02 (0)
• Re: how tightly were they bound? - Davey 09:36:14 04/29/02 (11)
• just did a model - Mart 01:15:25 04/30/02 (8)
• Re: just did a model - Davey 06:37:38 04/30/02 (7)
• IME still not nearly as audible as Q - Mart 07:40:52 04/30/02 (6)
• Re: IME still not nearly as audible as Q - s.hum 08:56:32 04/30/02 (5)
• Re: IME still not nearly as audible as Q - Mart 10:54:34 04/30/02 (4)
• Either or then? - s.hum 11:33:53 04/30/02 (3)
• Re: Either or then? - Mart 11:55:44 04/30/02 (2)
• Re: Either or then? - s.hum 13:33:11 04/30/02 (1)
• "is this a good thing?" - Mart 16:07:22 04/30/02 (0)
• so, yours weren't bound at all? - Mart 11:53:51 04/29/02 (0)
• re: capacitance - Mart 11:03:16 04/29/02 (0)

Follow Ups

• the picture - Mart 18:26:48 04/28/02 (25)
• Re: the picture - monk1 08:27:21 04/29/02 (3)
• coil capacitance - Arbelos 13:48:49 04/29/02 (1)
• Re: coil capacitance - monk1 10:42:46 05/01/02 (0)
• no one I know measured it - Mart 11:23:43 04/29/02 (0)
• Re: the picture - Davey 18:44:15 04/28/02 (20)
• it is the mutual inductance that's responsible for keeping the inductance - Mart 19:41:15 04/28/02 (19)
• Re: it is the mutual inductance that's responsible for keeping the inductance - Davey 20:45:25 04/28/02 (18)
• granted but ... - Mart 00:50:20 04/29/02 (17)
• Re: granted but ... - Davey 06:54:04 04/29/02 (16)
• how tightly were they bound? - Mart 07:13:55 04/29/02 (15)
• Re: how tightly were they bound? - s.hum 10:16:07 04/29/02 (2)
• after contemplation - Mart 16:56:32 04/29/02 (1)
• Re: after contemplation - s.hum 17:51:49 04/29/02 (0)
• Re: how tightly were they bound? - Davey 09:36:14 04/29/02 (11)
• just did a model - Mart 01:15:25 04/30/02 (8)
• Re: just did a model - Davey 06:37:38 04/30/02 (7)
• IME still not nearly as audible as Q - Mart 07:40:52 04/30/02 (6)
• Re: IME still not nearly as audible as Q - s.hum 08:56:32 04/30/02 (5)
• Re: IME still not nearly as audible as Q - Mart 10:54:34 04/30/02 (4)
• Either or then? - s.hum 11:33:53 04/30/02 (3)
• Re: Either or then? - Mart 11:55:44 04/30/02 (2)
• Re: Either or then? - s.hum 13:33:11 04/30/02 (1)
• "is this a good thing?" - Mart 16:07:22 04/30/02 (0)
• so, yours weren't bound at all? - Mart 11:53:51 04/29/02 (0)
• re: capacitance - Mart 11:03:16 04/29/02 (0)