|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
|
|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
In Reply to: Maggie's room vs other dipole posted by timm on April 1, 2017 at 19:44:24:
Timm, I posted something in the very early morning which I inadvertently erased shortly after...coffee was still brewing :) The point is that open dipoles which want to reach down into the low/mid bass frequencies -- unaided by boxed drivers -- are inherently harder to position than those which add boxes for extension.
The flip side is that, once you get pure dipoles properly dialed-in and driven, the (less-known) dynamic impact and bass they bring along can provide a superior experience (jointly with their traditionally-known strengths). With Maggies, one can actually achieve this kind of experience with even some basic models (though with some deliberate tweaking dedication).
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Maggie's room vs other dipole - JBen 10:16:40 04/02/17 (1)
- RE: Maggie's room vs other dipole - timm 10:44:34 04/02/17 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
