In Reply to: LS 50's posted by mbnx01 on October 6, 2015 at 20:01:52:
I totally agree, so many variables at a dealers, I did say they had a Marantz Intergraded and Marantz CD player in a fairly big room and the stands were too high...and did say they were "good"...I just really expected more that's all...
When I heard the .7's, they were in a small room with a REL S2 sub, that mated perfectly with them. .7's had a Rotel frontend, but did all the Maggie things very well...I had owned a pair of MG 12's way back when and thought the .7's were a much better speaker...
My main point was they were a much better value...IMHO...that's all...
The 1.7i's in a small room with that Ayre front end were truly impressive...The Ayre Intergraded being only 120 Watts into 4 ohms pushed them pretty well in that small room...
What is your frontend with .7's...Just curious...
Thank you for your input...
Mark
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: LS 50's - Mark Man 05:40:12 10/07/15 (8)
- RE: LS 50's - mbnx01 13:56:38 10/07/15 (7)
- Great front end for the .7's - Mark Man 20:39:54 10/07/15 (6)
- RE: Great front end for the .7's - Satie 20:40:28 10/08/15 (0)
- RE: Great front end for the .7's - mbnx01 09:24:50 10/08/15 (4)
- RE: Great front end for the .7's - Mark Man 09:29:51 10/08/15 (3)
- RE: Great front end for the .7's - mbnx01 14:04:34 10/08/15 (2)
- RE: Great front end for the .7's - Mark Man 16:47:03 10/08/15 (1)
- RE: Great front end for the .7's - mbnx01 17:52:07 10/08/15 (0)