In Reply to: RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! posted by computerman on May 31, 2012 at 12:18:21:
The 1D's will definitely sound better for bass than the IIIa's and you can use them with a single-pole crossover. The only reason I suggested the sub idea was that you still have the IIIa woofer panel there, which puts the 1-D woofers pretty far away from the midrange. And they really want to be close if you're crossing over that high. At 100 Hz, localization doesn't matter as much and the wavelength is about 10' so you won't have trouble with lobing if the woofers aren't by the midrange. It will also diffract more easily around the IIIa's if you have the 1-D's behind. Ultimately, I think you want to go with the 1-D woofers, Neo 8 midrange, and IIIa tweeters up front, which leaves the 1-D tweeter and IIIa woofer/mid for surrounds.
Also, you can use the 1-D's behind the mid-tweeter (or IIIa's) in an arrangement similar to the Tympani IVa split arrangement which I'll be using, it's great for small rooms. I do expect to have to equalize down the bass in mine, but that will just give me lower distortion, more headroom, and more extension!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 12:59:40 05/31/12 (35)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 14:48:38 05/31/12 (34)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 15:09:47 05/31/12 (33)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - Norman M 10:28:55 06/01/12 (28)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 13:14:03 06/01/12 (27)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - Norman M 08:50:18 06/02/12 (26)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 10:26:53 06/02/12 (25)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 13:16:15 06/02/12 (24)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 14:07:51 06/02/12 (23)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 13:33:54 06/18/12 (3)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 16:56:05 06/18/12 (2)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 18:42:52 06/18/12 (1)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 19:30:48 06/18/12 (0)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 11:23:27 06/03/12 (18)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 18:14:05 06/03/12 (17)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 14:26:55 06/04/12 (15)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 15:19:04 06/04/12 (14)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 17:24:25 06/04/12 (13)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 18:18:23 06/04/12 (12)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 19:38:44 06/04/12 (11)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 19:50:40 06/04/12 (10)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 19:59:46 06/04/12 (9)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 18:45:31 06/05/12 (8)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 19:09:28 06/05/12 (7)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 19:33:37 06/05/12 (6)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 10:29:06 06/06/12 (5)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 10:39:04 06/06/12 (4)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 10:52:07 06/06/12 (3)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 16:46:48 06/06/12 (2)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 17:15:31 06/06/12 (1)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 18:04:01 06/06/12 (0)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 18:41:07 06/03/12 (0)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 18:56:25 05/31/12 (3)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 08:09:02 06/01/12 (2)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - computerman 10:19:30 06/01/12 (1)
- RE: IIIa Foil Project Sucess! - josh358 07:03:26 06/02/12 (0)