In Reply to: RE: Maggie madness posted by josh358 on March 27, 2012 at 06:15:27:
I know about the China problem, but fact is that neodymium is better and not as expensive you would like to point out.
look here:
http://www.gaussboys.com/magnets/blocks/
I have a small bussines myself for over 20 years and I have never heard of this 1:5 rule.
Ok, it is normal to invest first and earn later, but with a large order you get a much better price as listed.
So with your rule a 3.6 is worth about 500$+ 500$ man labour,other cost multiplied by 5( MG earnings?).
The rubber magnets used by MG, you can get for 0,000$ :)
Give me one reason except greater earnings for MG , why not using this neodymium magnets? Don't be so conservative.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Maggie madness - berni 06:42:08 03/27/12 (6)
- RE: Maggie madness - josh358 08:17:39 03/27/12 (5)
- RE: Maggie madness - berni 09:07:15 03/27/12 (0)
- RE: Maggie madness - berni 08:48:25 03/27/12 (3)
- RE: Maggie madness - josh358 09:41:02 03/27/12 (2)
- RE: Maggie madness - berni 10:01:23 03/27/12 (1)
- RE: Maggie madness - josh358 18:57:08 03/27/12 (0)