That's the spirit laddie!

Follow Ups Full Thread

Topic - Modified Maggie 3.6 vs. stock 3.7 - dmisra2058 13:17:03 03/19/12 (33)

RE: Modified Maggie 3.6 vs. stock 3.7 - djcxxx 17:50:01 03/19/12 (1)

RE: Modified Maggie 3.6 vs. stock 3.7 - josh358 19:13:43 03/19/12 (0)

Interesting question - hopefully you will get more input than mine. :-)) ... - andyr 15:27:43 03/19/12 (30)

RE: Interesting question - hopefully you will get more input than mine. :-)) ... - neolith 17:27:40 03/19/12 (28)

Valid points but ... - andyr 03:50:46 03/20/12 (1)

RE: Valid points but ... - josh358 09:44:09 03/21/12 (0)

RE: Interesting question - hopefully you will get more input than mine. :-)) ... - josh358 19:22:13 03/19/12 (25)

"I'm not sure that the 3.6 would allow you to use single pole crossovers without compromising performance" ... - andyr 03:42:06 03/20/12 (24)

RE: "I'm not sure that the 3.6 would allow you to use single pole crossovers without compromising performance" ... - josh358 10:00:47 03/20/12 (14)

RE: "I'm not sure that the 3.6 would allow you to use single pole crossovers without compromising performance" ... - Satie 10:16:26 03/22/12 (1)

RE: "I'm not sure that the 3.6 would allow you to use single pole crossovers without compromising performance" ... - josh358 16:02:09 03/22/12 (0)

RE: "I'm not sure that the 3.6 would allow you to use single pole crossovers without compromising performance" ... - Dawnrazor 10:03:25 03/20/12 (11)

RE: "I'm not sure that the 3.6 would allow you to use single pole crossovers without compromising performance" ... - josh358 10:29:52 03/20/12 (10)

6dB slopes ... - andyr 12:35:30 03/20/12 (9)

That's the spirit laddie! - JBen 13:23:28 03/20/12 (8)

Measurements - probably not, mate! Could nae be bothered :-)) ... - andyr 14:56:44 03/20/12 (7)

RE: Measurements - probably not, mate! Could nae be bothered :-)) ... - JBen 17:42:27 03/20/12 (3)

"The difference is in the soundstage each one projects." ... - andyr 18:18:53 03/20/12 (2)

RE: "The difference is in the soundstage each one projects." ... - josh358 09:49:05 03/21/12 (0)

RE: "The difference is in the soundstage each one projects." ... - JBen 18:34:20 03/20/12 (0)

RE: Measurements - probably not, mate! Could nae be bothered :-)) ... - Dawnrazor 17:27:23 03/20/12 (2)

"I thought you had to reverse the polarity even on the 1st order slopes"??? ... - andyr 17:35:53 03/20/12 (1)

RE: "I thought you had to reverse the polarity even on the 1st order slopes"??? ... - neolith 06:01:55 03/22/12 (0)

RE: "I'm not sure that the 3.6 would allow you to use single pole crossovers without compromising performance" ... - tyu 08:50:20 03/20/12 (0)

RE: "I'm not sure that the 3.6 would allow you to use single pole crossovers without compromising performance" ... - Dawnrazor 08:46:25 03/20/12 (7)

RE: "I'm not sure that the 3.6 would allow you to use single pole crossovers without compromising performance" ... - patmacav 20:27:26 03/21/12 (0)

They started to grow on him 3 months later - sbrians 17:06:32 03/20/12 (5)

RE: They started to grow on him 3 months later - Dawnrazor 04:01:01 03/21/12 (4)

RE: They started to grow on him 3 months later - old guy 42 09:23:18 03/21/12 (3)

LOL - Dawnrazor 00:05:52 03/23/12 (2)

RE: LOL - old guy 42 08:25:43 03/23/12 (0)

RE: LOL - JBen 07:57:28 03/23/12 (0)

RE: Interesting question - hopefully you will get more input than mine. :-)) ... - JBen 16:57:06 03/19/12 (0)

Follow Ups

That's the spirit laddie! - JBen 13:23:28 03/20/12 (8)

Measurements - probably not, mate! Could nae be bothered :-)) ... - andyr 14:56:44 03/20/12 (7)

RE: Measurements - probably not, mate! Could nae be bothered :-)) ... - JBen 17:42:27 03/20/12 (3)

"The difference is in the soundstage each one projects." ... - andyr 18:18:53 03/20/12 (2)

RE: "The difference is in the soundstage each one projects." ... - josh358 09:49:05 03/21/12 (0)

RE: "The difference is in the soundstage each one projects." ... - JBen 18:34:20 03/20/12 (0)

RE: Measurements - probably not, mate! Could nae be bothered :-)) ... - Dawnrazor 17:27:23 03/20/12 (2)

"I thought you had to reverse the polarity even on the 1st order slopes"??? ... - andyr 17:35:53 03/20/12 (1)

RE: "I thought you had to reverse the polarity even on the 1st order slopes"??? ... - neolith 06:01:55 03/22/12 (0)

Post a Message!