In Reply to: RE: Are you *really* paying attention, or... posted by morricab on January 26, 2012 at 06:37:03:
Although the 845 is a very linear tube, the requisite drive voltage often results in more overall distortion. The 211 is even worse, as it draws grid current when pushed - grid current regions tend to be rather nonlinear. Both the 845 and 211 require rather high plate voltages as well as a higher load impedance, which complicates output transformer design/behavior. The 300B is probably the better valve for Class A2 operation. SET has its own suite of issues - no natural mechanism by which to cancel even order harmonic distortions, significantly more transformer distortion and, obviously, less power delivery.Hey, I bought a bloody valve amp to try
a hell of a big change for a high-power, solid-state guy.I like what I bought; I like it a lot.
But, every design on earth I cannot buy.
;-)
Edits: 01/27/12 01/27/12 01/27/12
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- maybe; maybe not - wazoo 15:04:30 01/27/12 (41)
- RE: maybe; maybe not - morricab 01:46:09 01/29/12 (38)
- very old information - wazoo 09:43:30 01/29/12 (32)
- RE: very old information - morricab 13:16:16 01/29/12 (27)
- no argument - no problem - wazoo 12:57:32 01/31/12 (18)
- RE: no argument - no problem - morricab 04:42:32 02/01/12 (17)
- RE: no argument - no problem - Medium Jim 08:50:22 02/01/12 (16)
- RE: no argument - no problem - morricab 02:46:31 02/02/12 (15)
- RE: no argument - no problem - Medium Jim 08:19:48 02/02/12 (14)
- RE: no argument - no problem - morricab 01:28:00 02/03/12 (11)
- RE: no argument - no problem - Medium Jim 07:08:07 02/03/12 (10)
- RE: no argument - no problem - morricab 07:20:51 02/04/12 (7)
- RE: no argument - no problem - Medium Jim 07:55:31 02/04/12 (6)
- RE: no argument - no problem - morricab 09:35:47 02/08/12 (5)
- RE: no argument - no problem - Medium Jim 11:42:58 02/08/12 (4)
- RE: no argument - no problem - morricab 15:21:49 02/09/12 (3)
- RE: no argument - no problem - Medium Jim 15:50:38 02/09/12 (2)
- RE: no argument - no problem - morricab 02:19:35 02/10/12 (1)
- RE: no argument - no problem - Medium Jim 07:03:31 02/10/12 (0)
- RE: no argument - no problem - Medium Jim 08:02:44 02/03/12 (1)
- RE: no argument - no problem - Medium Jim 21:36:58 02/03/12 (0)
- Final Thoughts - Medium Jim 09:36:45 02/02/12 (1)
- RE: Final Thoughts - morricab 01:06:45 02/03/12 (0)
- RE: very old information - Medium Jim 14:38:05 01/29/12 (7)
- RE: very old information - morricab 01:18:06 01/30/12 (6)
- RE: very old information - Medium Jim 07:18:18 01/30/12 (5)
- RE: very old information - morricab 02:14:19 01/31/12 (4)
- RE: very old information - Medium Jim 16:19:03 01/31/12 (0)
- RE: very old information - Medium Jim 07:17:24 01/31/12 (2)
- RE: very old information - morricab 04:24:02 02/01/12 (1)
- RE: very old information - Medium Jim 07:21:35 02/01/12 (0)
- RE: very old information - Medium Jim 10:33:04 01/29/12 (3)
- then, you see my point... - wazoo 11:36:04 01/29/12 (2)
- RE: then, you see my point... - Medium Jim 12:06:24 01/29/12 (1)
- RE: then, you see my point... - morricab 13:20:52 01/29/12 (0)
- Not to stoke the fire... - Medium Jim 09:28:07 01/29/12 (4)
- RE: Not to stoke the fire... - morricab 02:18:59 01/31/12 (3)
- RE: Not to stoke the fire... - Medium Jim 07:13:10 01/31/12 (2)
- RE: Not to stoke the fire... - morricab 04:28:57 02/01/12 (1)
- NITA nt - Medium Jim 07:20:15 02/01/12 (0)
- RE: maybe; maybe not - 66mgb 16:50:40 01/27/12 (1)
- not what I meant (but one never really knows ;-) - wazoo 18:02:55 01/27/12 (0)