|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
|
|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
In Reply to: RE: Jvb, that's the first calculator I used in setting up my MultiMag prototypes! posted by JBen on September 24, 2010 at 13:28:02:
J,
The other repeatable thing here is that, IMAGING, is better sustained by thicker cabling. However, thicker cable is not easily made into great top-end producers. That seems to be the point at which bundling thin multi solid-cores (keeping their indivudual insulation) does much better. Again, with no braiding.
I am not sure that this is an accurate conclusion. Sure I bet you heard it this way. But I think it has more to do with vibrations than being thicker. Said another way, if you use the thin wire AND treat for vibration, the imaging is great, but it can suffer if you dont treat for it. The multirun thicker cable you made is naturally better at handling vibrations because of its mass construction and teflon....
Think about that conclusion in light of one strand of magwire vs that monster cable you mention. Which one has better imaging???
Cut to razor sounding violins
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- RE: Jvb, that's the first calculator I used in setting up my MultiMag prototypes! - Dawnrazor 05:39:58 09/25/10 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
