In Reply to: Seven-foot equilateral triangle. posted by Al Sekela on April 17, 2007 at 16:50:24:
Due to cable lengths, I was constrained to a smaller triangle. I found that I needed to be slightly nearer than would produce an equilateral - but ONLY slightly. As I moved a little closer, I started getting the feeling I was wearing headphones. As I moved outside of the equilateral, the tonal balance started getting objectionable. Inside that sweet spot, which was actually a little larger (relatively speaking) than a more "normal" orientation yields me, magic happened.To the nay-sayers: Don't dismiss this concept out of hand, but don't judge it from a half-assed experiment either. Give it a go, and be serious about it. Just prepare to be surprised. PG, if you're reading this, they don't beam in this orientation (common ground after all).
"Jazz is not dead - it just smells funny" FZ♬
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: equilateral triangle - agreed - wazoo 18:52:21 04/17/07 (1)
- Re: equilateral triangle - agreed - Dawnrazor 22:05:41 04/17/07 (0)