|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
|
|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
In Reply to: Re: Maggies and active crossovers posted by gymwear5@hotmail.com on November 20, 2006 at 10:38:13:
Well, passive crossover design for a Maggie is somewhat simpler than a conventional speaker because the impedances involved are resistive in nature. I wouldn't say a designer is "limited" by the impedance, but it certainly has to be incorporated into the design. For a line-level crossover you really don't have to consider it.Ultimately, the shape of the electrical slopes driving the transducers produces the final output. My point was that.....in the case of the 1.6.....the electrical slopes for the stock network are completely different than those produced by a generic active crossover with LR24 slopes. A comparison of active and passive in that case is really not valid. It's apples and oranges.
Cheers,
Davey.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Maggies and active crossovers - Davey 15:34:52 11/20/06 (2)
- Re: Maggies and active crossovers - lne937s 08:02:55 11/21/06 (1)
- Re: Maggies and active crossovers - Davey 12:20:55 11/21/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
