|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
|
|
Planar Speaker Asylum Welcome! Need support, you got it. Or share your ideas and experiences. |
|
In Reply to: Bi-amping 1.6s posted by Sebrof on October 31, 2006 at 13:37:58:
on my MMG's, I've used the MCintosh 2205 in HP or LP applications, my Tube Dyna in the HP, Dyna 400 in the LP. NAD 2150 anywhere, the Amp section of my HK520 rcvr has been in either/both sections as well. Depending on the crossover - gain matching is level to the attenuators (level controls) at the xover output or amplifier input. I have a home made analog xover, and a older Rane Analog - but I'm using the Behringer Ultra drive now in the system because of the eq. I had to use a little + high treble with the dyna, the other amp combos needed a sloping down signal. I like the Behringer also because I can remove or add a "presence dip" eq (.6Q centered at 3KHz) with just a few button presses. Some recordings seem to already have it, others sound better with it.I liked the sound of the tube HP best - but after eq they all sound pretty good.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Follow Ups
- Re: Bi-amping 1.6s - gymwear5@hotmail.com 12:56:42 11/01/06 (0)
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2024, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
