Tube DIY Asylum

Do It Yourself (DIY) paradise for tube and SET project builders.

Return to Tube DIY Asylum


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

What to do with 412 volts

66.56.54.187

Posted on March 8, 2017 at 17:28:26
BofService
Audiophile

Posts: 734
Location: Atlanta
Joined: February 28, 2003
I've come upon a very nice vintage Chicago transformer and choke set that features a 1000vac (CT) @125ma winding, a 470vac (CT) @100ma winding, plus 2x 6.3v and 2x 5v (no CTs). In addition, it came with 2x matching Chicago 8H chokes each rated at 125ma. Modeled in PSUDII as an LCLC, the 1000vac winding produces 412vdc using a 6ax4 rectifier and 2x 30uf caps. Ripple is .035ma (edited 3/10).

Of concern is the "125ma" rating of the PT and chokes, and the lack of center taps for any of the filament windings. I am assuming that the rating printed on the PT and chokes is based on a choke (LCLC) input PS. Is that likely a correct assumption? If so the transformer compliment suggests "300B" with separate PS for the drivers, assuming there is a solution to the "no CT" issue.

However, before I start accumulating parts for such a project, what other tube compliment might I investigate bearing in mind the voltage and current availability?

Also note that I am fully aware that these are old fashioned "high resistance" PS components, considered by some to be "low-fi". I don't wish to engage in that debate.

TIA.

Gary

 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
125mA will get you one channel, posted on March 8, 2017 at 17:46:02
Chip647
Audiophile

Posts: 1658
Location: The South
Joined: December 24, 2012
Frankly, designing for found power transformers that are goofy will simply cost you time and money. Can't think of a way to make a decent two channel set up with that. Mono, that is another story. Think 845.

 

RE: 125mA will get you one channel, posted on March 8, 2017 at 18:13:57
BofService
Audiophile

Posts: 734
Location: Atlanta
Joined: February 28, 2003
Thanks for your thoughts Chip647. Maybe you are right.

Seems likely there is a kind of high-ish voltage, low current power tube that would work though. The 6V6, for example, would typically be run at 34ma with 315vdc. Max voltage for a 6V6GTA is 350vdc so 6V6 is not a good option, but I bet there are options that would work.

G

 

RE: What to do with 412 volts, posted on March 8, 2017 at 18:17:44
hifipaul
Audiophile

Posts: 671
Location: NY
Joined: December 22, 2008
Basing a project around a PT is not a good idea.....But I do it anyway. It's a good exercize. You can raise the B+ to ~460v with a better rectifier or anywhere in between 415 to 460v. Low current is your limit. SE 10, 50, or 842 will work. Also SE 45s will work if DC coupled. Suitable filament supplies will be a challenge.

 

RE: What to do with 412 volts, posted on March 8, 2017 at 18:22:46
BofService
Audiophile

Posts: 734
Location: Atlanta
Joined: February 28, 2003
Thanks for your thoughts hifipaul. I appreciate the suggestions. Will take a look at those tubes. Worst case I can buy additional filament transformers.

I hadn't thought of direct coupling. I think that would work for 6V6, 6aq5, etc, as well as the 45.

G

 

RE: What to do with 412 volts, posted on March 8, 2017 at 18:32:57
Eli Duttman
Audiophile

Posts: 9414
Location: Monroe Township, NJ
Joined: March 31, 2000
I'm inclined to agree with the choke I/P assessment.

A stereo amp is possible, if you go SE. "Fixed" bias, UL mode, KT88 "finals" will get you a fair amount of O/P power. While a little "shorter" primary impedance would be nice, Edcor's CXSE25-2.5K O/P trafo seems to be a possibility.

Use a 5R4 to rectify the 500-0-500 winding and a 5AR4 to rectify the 235-0-235 winding. I'm very dubious about those 5 VAC windings feeding 300Bs. IMO, it's $ to donuts that the vintage trafo was intended for multi-grid O/P tubes. Notice that both suggested vacuum rectifiers draw 2 A. of filament current, which will be safe. Increase the final reservoir capacitance in the LCLC filter.

Phasing up and connecting the 2 6.3 VAC windings in parallel could give you enough current for the KT88 heaters. Get something low cost from AnTek for small signal tube heating.

Eli D.

 

Cart before the horse, posted on March 8, 2017 at 19:53:33
drlowmu
Manufacturer

Posts: 9706
Location: East of Kansas City
Joined: January 10, 2005
What sort of amp does your system require? How efficient are your speakers?

Find a good matching amp circuit, for your system. Sell this thing, it likely doesn't match your OPTIMAL system needs. Shop from the very broad Hammond line of devices, and build whats best for your entire system, a design you like.

That is what to do.

Happy choosing, chose well !!

Have fun.

Jeff medwin

 

RE: 125mA will get you one channel, posted on March 8, 2017 at 19:58:35
drlowmu
Manufacturer

Posts: 9706
Location: East of Kansas City
Joined: January 10, 2005
Its like buying a new suit at Good Will Industries, but its the wrong size, and you are wanting to wear it !!


Jeff Medwin CHIP is 100% correct, WASTE of time and money.

 

RE: Are these military potted trannys?, posted on March 9, 2017 at 08:45:49
DAK
Audiophile

Posts: 1757
Location: PACIFIC
Joined: August 8, 2010
Contributor
  Since:
December 0, 0000
There might be some derating built into them. You could build a SE el34/kt66 amp like Eli suggested. With biasing at 60ma. Then see how warm they get with running 6550 tubes with the bias set at 70ma. If they get pretty hot after an hour you probably need to back down. But, el34 or el37 and kt66 sound really nice at 60 to 65ma.

 

RE: What to do with 412 volts, posted on March 9, 2017 at 11:53:09
megasat16
Audiophile

Posts: 196
Location: SoCal
Joined: April 15, 2015
May be fine running a stereo amp 6B4G or 6A3 PP amps. Needs to lower the ripple.

Sorry but 845 isn't going to be happy with 450V with 120mA supply for mono config. Needs around 500V-600V @100mA for 845 to sounds good or a lot more than 120mA for the lower Plate resistance.
.
.
.Thou shall not stand where I type for I carry a bottle of Certified Audiophile Air and a Pure Silver Whip.

 

RE: Are these military potted trannys?, posted on March 9, 2017 at 18:13:53
Tre'
Industry Professional

Posts: 12031
Location: So. Cal.
Joined: February 9, 2002
"But, el34 or el37 and kt66 sound really nice at 60 to 65ma."

so do 300Bs.


Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"

 

RE: Are these military potted trannys?, posted on March 9, 2017 at 18:40:26
Eli Duttman
Audiophile

Posts: 9414
Location: Monroe Township, NJ
Joined: March 31, 2000
I was overly optimistic in thinking KT88s. The 6L6GC/KT66 suggestion is excellent, given the near perfect fit of Edcor's CXSE25-3.75K O/P "iron". ;>)
http://www.edcorusa.com/cxse25-375k

Add Tubelab's PowerDrive, for a positive g1 regime (Class "A2"), and the capability of the suggested O/P trafo will be utilized. Some magnetic headroom has to be reserved for GNFB, as unassisted UL mode is unlikely to exhibit an adequate damping factor.
http://www.mif.pg.gda.pl/homepages/frank/sheets/127/6/6L6GC.pdf

I double checked the GZ34/5AR4 data sheet. The type is OK fed by 500-0-500 working into a choke I/P filter. :>)
http://www.mif.pg.gda.pl/homepages/frank/sheets/010/g/GZ34.pdf
So, avoid the large 5R4 forward drop and use a 5AR4 to rectify the "tall" B+ rail.

A 5V4, 6106, or 6087/5Y3WGTB is quite adequate to rectify the "short" B+ rail.

Eli D.

 

Unfortunately, i never collected them, posted on March 9, 2017 at 18:41:53
DAK
Audiophile

Posts: 1757
Location: PACIFIC
Joined: August 8, 2010
Contributor
  Since:
December 0, 0000
when i started to collect tubes about 25 years ago. Compared to tungsol 6550 and such, the 300b was still an expensive tube. i could have blown my whole tube budget on just a couple of 300s. there would have been little fun in that.

 

RE: The lack of a heater CT is not much of a problem, posted on March 9, 2017 at 19:37:03
DAK
Audiophile

Posts: 1757
Location: PACIFIC
Joined: August 8, 2010
Contributor
  Since:
December 0, 0000
You can make a "virtual" ct by using a matched pair of 100R 1w resistors, although 1/2 w is adequate. Put the resistor on each leg of the heater circuit and that works very well and i have had no problems with hum doing that.

 

RE: Are these military potted trannys?, posted on March 10, 2017 at 15:30:49
BofService
Audiophile

Posts: 734
Location: Atlanta
Joined: February 28, 2003
Thanks DAK. I thought of that as well, and if I am using the lower voltage winding at well under its rated current that might give me some breathing room on the higher voltage section's current. The hot fingers test is probably appropriate here.

 

RE: Are these military potted trannys?, posted on March 10, 2017 at 16:05:21
BofService
Audiophile

Posts: 734
Location: Atlanta
Joined: February 28, 2003
Thanks for the great suggestions Eli. I had been assuming SE, as PP requires 2x the tubes and around 2x the current. I really appreciate you researching the OP tubes and rectifiers. I used the Edcor CSXE series on another amp, but I believe a lower impedance.

The transformer is indeed potted, chokes as well. It has a "Spec" number (14513) but I don't know if they are military or not. They are black, and the PT weighs 14 lbs, 6 oz. I didn't mention before that the 5v filament windings are each rated for 3A. One of the 6.3v windings is rated at 2A and the other 2.5A.

Still quite a few options out there, but hard to anticipate what the PS would do near its limits.

 

RE: Are these military potted trannys?, posted on March 10, 2017 at 17:41:03
Eli Duttman
Audiophile

Posts: 9414
Location: Monroe Township, NJ
Joined: March 31, 2000
The KT66 draws 1.3 A. of heater current, while the 6L6GC draws 900 mA. of heater current. Also, the 6L6GC can safely dissipate a bit more power.
http://www.mif.pg.gda.pl/homepages/frank/sheets/084/k/KT66_GEC.pdf

Seems like the 6L6GC is the O/P tube to use. Jim McShane shows a "reissue" black plate TungSol 6L6GC-STR for $21.50/tube. Yum!

With some 'A2 action, 12 WPC is not an unreasonable target.

Eli D.

 

RE: Are these military potted trannys?, posted on March 11, 2017 at 11:01:23
BofService
Audiophile

Posts: 734
Location: Atlanta
Joined: February 28, 2003
The PT is a big potted thing, surplus, but I don't know if it is military or not. It weighs 14 lbs. Regulation seems quite good. The B+ is rated 500-0-500. Actual (at the rated 115v) is 515-0-515, 535-0-535 at 120vac.

 

RE: Does it have military markings, posted on March 12, 2017 at 11:05:37
DAK
Audiophile

Posts: 1757
Location: PACIFIC
Joined: August 8, 2010
Contributor
  Since:
December 0, 0000
I really like those big potted trannys, moving them around is how i get my exercise. If it were from the Navy it would have an "anchor" logo stenciled on it. I would think it must be derated some, maybe 5% maybe more? Have you decided on what kind of amp you want to build? I am on SEP kick now so i would vote for 6L6 type amp with fixed bias. That way you could experiment with higher power tubes like 6550 as you can try different tubes in the family with just adjusting the bias. If you use the "RH" type circuit it only requires a single 12at7 driver tube but you can also use the 6sl7 or 6sn7 with the rh universal circuit.

 

RE: Does it have military markings, posted on March 12, 2017 at 12:40:44
BofService
Audiophile

Posts: 734
Location: Atlanta
Joined: February 28, 2003

Good thinking DAK. Last year I built an RH "Universal" that allows me to experiment with the 6L6 family, including the 807 and 1625 (of which I have several). It turned out good, and I appreciate Alec Kitic's design and documentation efforts on that amplifier.

On this amp I'd like to build with 300Bs and CCS 5842 drivers. Since the B+ from my transformer seems well regulated, that encourages me to think it will work with any tubes that run well at 60ma (or less), 300B included.

Last night I used PSUD to design a separate power supply using the PT's 235-0-235 winding and a couple chokes I have on hand. The supply gives me about 256vdc with .005 v of ripple at 28ma. This should work nicely for a 10M45 CCS and a 5842 per channel. My thoughts are to use the TubeLab "Simple 45" schematic for the driver stage. There are all manner of examples out there for how to do the OP stage. I'm looking at the "sjselectronics SE104it" schematic as a model for the OP right now. I have a pair of Hammond 125ESE OPTs I can use for breadboarding, and invest in some better iron later. I think I have everything else on hand except the OP tubes.

I'd consider trying the TubeLab PowerDrive topology, but I don't quite understand how it works, nor how I would implement it with 2 separate power supplies, nor whether it could work without a negative supply. Also there is the issue that the Toshiba 2SK2700 MOSFET has been deprecated. Which of the analogs are people using to replace it?

 

RE: Does it have military markings, posted on March 12, 2017 at 14:39:24
DAK
Audiophile

Posts: 1757
Location: PACIFIC
Joined: August 8, 2010
Contributor
  Since:
December 0, 0000
Awesome, it always helps to have a plan in place to help guide your project along. But, regarding, SS stuff i am not a convert, yet. I still find that even using an LM317 device to be a hassle since it is much less reliable than a resistor.

 

Page processed in 0.034 seconds.