Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded
A Response Hole?
98.193.42.217 |
||
Posted on May 30, 2021 at 18:24:13 | ||
Posts: 899
Location: Northern Illinois Joined: October 3, 2007 Contributor Since: April 28, 2012 |
I'm torn between buying the Dayton t-lines I posted about recently & building a sub-sat system using very small single drivers & a REL Tzero MkIII sub. The two approaches have their own strengths & weaknesses. I've experimented very extensively with very small single drivers, coming to value their lack of a crossover & their very wide dispersion. The imaging could be wonderful. Such a system, which I have implemented before with a different sub, can do a lot. The issue is a potential hole in the response of the proposed sub-sat system. I say this because the Fs of the ScanSpeak 5F driver is about 100Hz, while the REL's upper range is 120Hz. That 20Hz, give or take, is all the room I have for blending the two. Is that enough? Am I hunting for a problem that wouldn't exist in an actual small apartment living room furnished with minimal furniture & heavy rug? If it matters, a second identical sub could be in the cards at some point in the future. Opinions are appreciated, as always. "'Cause when love is gone, there's always justice./And when justice is gone, there's always force./And when force is gone, there's always Mom. Hi Mom!" Laurie Anderson, "O Superman (For Massenet)" |
RE: A Response Hole?, posted on June 1, 2021 at 09:44:38 | |
Posts: 10457
Location: NJ Joined: December 11, 2000 |
I hope they are worthy!
|