Hi-Rez Highway

New high resolution SACD releases, players and technology.

Return to Hi-Rez Highway


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

What happened to the HDTracks 24-352 rock albums?

99.17.101.172

Posted on August 20, 2024 at 22:09:42
barondla
Audiophile

Posts: 549
Location: midwest usa
Joined: May 26, 2007
They used to offer some rock albums in 24-352 resolution. My Oppo BDP 105 couldn't play them but the connected Ayre Codex DAC could. Unfortunately via USB, which the Oppo doesn't do. I bought Alan Parsons in 24-352 for the future.

The new Aurender N200 has USB output and with the Ayre plays 24-352 with ease. Thought it would be nice to download the Doors album as well. Now neither seem to be on HDTracks. Anyone know why?
Thanks,
barondla

 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
RE: What happened to the HDTracks 24-352 rock albums?, posted on August 21, 2024 at 05:19:23
HighEndWire
Audiophile

Posts: 1636
Joined: August 2, 2002
Don't know what happened to them but my guess certain things have to do with the site's agreements with record labels

 

Probably not worth their while...., posted on August 21, 2024 at 08:25:59
AbeCollins
Audiophile

Posts: 49320
Location: Maidenhead Grid Square DM79
Joined: June 22, 2001
Contributor
  Since:
February 2, 2002
Music downloads in general have been on a steep decline for decades and with 'hi-res' streaming services for audiophiles download businesses like HDTracks are probably on life support.

Even HDTracks is finalizing plans for a streaming service partnering with Lenbrook Media Group -- you know, the folks who acquired MQA technology - something we don't need.

P.S. For the price of one hi-res album download I can stream from a selection of several thousand hi-res albums all day long everyday for a month.... at less than $15/mo. All you can eat... and it's Yummy!



 

RE: What happened to the HDTracks 24-352 rock albums?, posted on August 21, 2024 at 09:02:01
Roseval
Audiophile

Posts: 1883
Joined: March 31, 2008
I'm most of all surprised by that number 352.
Looks like something simply oversampled.
The Well Tempered Computer

 

Not necessarily., posted on August 21, 2024 at 09:52:20
Kal Rubinson
Reviewer

Posts: 12646
Location: New York
Joined: June 5, 2002
There are modern recordings made originally in DXD (24/352.8 or 32/352.8). OTOH, it is questionable whether there is any real value in digitizing old recordings, such as the ones under discussion here, at such sample rates.

 

RE: Probably not worth their while...., posted on August 21, 2024 at 17:23:06
zacster
Audiophile

Posts: 2223
Location: NYC
Joined: November 22, 2003
I'm doing that right now! Someone I never heard of and wouldn't buy if I did, but that's the beauty of it. In hi-res too, 24/96. Maddy Kirgo is her name. Time to find another obscure musician...

 

Agreed, posted on August 22, 2024 at 13:15:09
E-Stat
Audiophile

Posts: 41156
Joined: May 12, 2000
Contributor
  Since:
April 5, 2002
especially "classic rock".

 

Page processed in 0.021 seconds.