![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
76.227.230.184
In Reply to: RE: Have you tried one on a Sondek? (nt) posted by kuma on August 26, 2010 at 16:20:29
but I have not listened to an ARO. You could get into either the Roksan forum or the Naim forum to check it out. I don't know of compatability issues with the LP12, but since both arms are used on XErxes and XErxes x I'm inclined to believe both could work on the linn. Some homework is maybe involved.
Edits: 08/26/10 08/26/10Follow Ups:
but I haven't heard a unipivot that is capable as the ARO on the Linn.
I assume that Artemiz is optimised for the Xerxes/TMS etc which are very different sounding from the Sondek.
That said, i'm sure it'll fit with an appropriate arm board.
Anyways, I already have 2.5 AROs so I'm all set. I was just cautioning Fishfood.
Which do you prefer and why?
As for myself, I was slightly disapointed with the Scout. Not that it wasnt a fun table---it does some things good but -I wanted a more refined sound. Anyway after listening to Fretless, Bruckner9, and Ken lyon, I thought I would take a chance on the Xexesx.I'm not disapointed.It definatly separates the instruments and shows them all in an individual light.Expensive thing but it definatly excells.
I lusted after the TMS for a while, but the lack of US support for the Roksan tables scared me a bit to pursue further.
A Sondek is common and a set up assistance and parts are easier to be found than the Roksan tables.
Nothing worse than buying something expensive blind and find out later that it does not work in your rig OR screwing around trying to tune the deck blind.
Sondek is easy because I am familiar with it and know when it's not performing to the optimum.
If I had the same level of knowledge and comfort, I'm certain that I'll be happy with a Roksan, too.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: