Audio Asylum Thread Printer
Get a view of an entire thread on one page
|For Sale Ads|
In Reply to: RE: XLM Mkii + Rega posted by mr.bear on April 15, 2017 at 10:40:55
was not as high compliance as other models if I understand correctly. The cartridge database over at VE has the dynamic compliance coefficient at 40, which is high but not 65 like the higher compliance model. I have a mk II that I've put on a bunch of different medium mass arms and it sounded great on all of them with no tracking issues. I agree that the math doesn't entirely add up but proof is in the pudding. I've had other medium to high compliance carts on the same arms that had noticeable resonances and tracking issues. Go figure. My dad has (or perhaps had) one on a Rega 250 and it also sounds/functions great. Its a great cart and about as good as you can get in MM, at least from what I've heard.
You can't cheat an honest man, never give a sucker an even break or smarten up a chump -- W.C. Fields
compliance. I had the MK II and MK III which worked fine in low/medium arms.
Opus 33 1/3
It was so high in compliance (the original ADC XLM) that it often seemed the suspension had collapsed, when in fact it was "normal". The cartridge body rode perilously close to the LP surface.
Post a Message!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: