|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
124.171.156.40
In Reply to: RE: Russia pretty much survived on her own until 1943, when they began winning e.g. Kursk, and never looked back. posted by Michael Samra on February 05, 2017 at 21:57:02
So, it doesn't look to me that lend lease was a critical factor for Russia.And, there's no data in that article.
Russia had a very large industrial sector. Russian production was a big factor in winning the war. No less important than the USA's.
Their weapons, esp. tanks and artillery, were at least as good as anyone elses. The Yak 3 and the Sturmovik were the best in their class.
Believe what you like, Mike, but I'll stick to what I know to be true.
Warmest
Tim Bailey
Skeptical Measurer & Audio Scrounger
Edits: 02/06/17Follow Ups:
The T34 was the best tank. Soviet artillery was effective, by sheer weight of numbers, not great accuracy. German officers had great respect for American artillery. "Acquired the target quickly."Yes, Russian production was very important. However, consider the fact that the military output of U.S. industry was barely bettered by the combined efforts of all the other belligerents on both sides.
Eli D.
Edits: 02/06/17
Exactly
We had production levels that were unreal. We had GM,Ford,Chrysler,Studebaker,Kaiser,were a few of the largest companies running full war time production while suspending all consumer vehicle production.
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong" H. L. Mencken
While consumer vehicle production was suspended, the U.S. was the only "player" to increase civil industrial output. All the other nations at war cut civil production WAY back.
Eli D.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: