|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
108.87.24.204
In Reply to: RE: What's left? posted by E-Stat on January 06, 2017 at 09:32:46
Add Lenco to that list.
Comparing any of these tables to an AR is a joke. An AR is pretty much worth it's original price. You can't polish a turd.
.
Freak out...Far out...In out....
Follow Ups:
It is worth noting that the AR-XA's price of %78 in the early 1960s works out to about $630 today.
They polished that "turd" in the places that matter. The machining in places critical to performance was to very close tolerances. Its performance met or beat NAB standards of the time.
I still have one in daily use and the music sounds fine.
DYI, that can be a pretty musically satisfying turd. ;^)
"The piano ain't got no wrong notes." Thelonious Monk
I agree totally, but if I were going to go down the suspended belt drive road I would start with with a Thorens TD-150 which I feel is a better table,(and value) and much easier to adapt a better arm to. I actually have two TD-150s and love them. I had an AR-XA for a while and was mostly unimpressed in comparison to the Thorens.
To each his own....
.
Freak out...Far out...In out....
Original price was $78. It's hard to find a working one for around a hundred, and people have done plenty of polishing--new bases, Magnepan Unitrac and Linn Basik arms, and the like.
But it's still a belt-drive turntable with an electric clock motor.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: