![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
66.36.144.81
In Reply to: Re: Or simply no feedback ? posted by Bazza on June 28, 2006 at 14:16:41:
this time you are perfectly right. I agree with you for the need of more power for dynamics. I'm using a triamplified system a P-P and two SET amplifiers. I'm wondering if such device can do any good for an amplifier used only to 700 hZ ? What do you think ?
![]()
Follow Ups:
Interesting question. Yesterday I asked the inventor, Mr Dao, if the device would benefit my subwoofer that is only used to 60 hz. He said yes so I am considering trying it on my Mirage BPS-400.
Should I assume that last time I wasn't right?
![]()
Can you make a try and post a report ? On their site they are mainly speaking about high frequencies improvment, but you and others repport also good results for the bass, so maybe thers is something.
Chris
![]()
I suspect that all of the frequencies are improved by the Dakiom products but high frequency information is not the most important thing for me. If they are not overly bright and cymbals shimmer and decay properly, I am pleased. Through my Quad 988 electrostats, and the Maggies that they replaced, highs are never over the top as they can be with metal dome tweeters so perhaps I have been spoiled.
I don't know if the increased feeling of live music is due to the highs being improved or an overall reduction in distortion.Let me say it like this .... There is more detail retrieval at all of the frequencies but none stood out from the other. This means that there is a neutrality that allows me to flow with the music and, if wanted, to find any instrument clearly. This flow is what I refer to as "coherence" - it just seems right and listenable for hours.
![]()
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: