![]() ![]() |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
I've been poking about the web looking at various speaker kits. Most recently North Creek has caught my eye. They have an attactive web site. Promote the quality of thier parts. And lay out cabinet designs that appear doable.Of course the problem with all speaker kits is that you can't listen to them until you've commited a good bit of time, money, and effort. Anyone have any experience with North Creek kits?
NorthCreek.com
Yes, I built the ME2 version of the well-known Ariel using the North Creek kit. My experience with North Creek was entirely satisfactory. Follow their links to Lynn Olson's site for more information on the Ariel design, but be forewarned - the Ariel cabinets are very difficult to build. That's why I built the ME2.I've been more than satisfied with the ME2. It's a terrific design, and not much more difficult to build than any other vented cabinet.
Also note: I tweaked the design to correct an apparent error in the calculated cabinet volume. Other discussions on this modification are available in the archives - do a search on Ariel or ME2.
Glad to hear you had good results.In reviewing the info at the North Creek site I notice that North Creek does not provide cabinet plans for the ME2. Is there a web site that has the plans for the ME2?
Can't say I know much about the Lynn Olson's as speakers, other than having seen the name in a few places. What led you to the Lynn Olson's over other North Creek offerings?
Thanks.
A link to Lynn Olson's web site is below, where you will find complete cabinet plans and discussion for the Ariel and the ME2. As you will see, this design is well enough regarded to have a builder's club, and several of the builders have web pages showing their accomplishments. As you will also see, the cabinet design for the Ariel is very complicated - 6 months is apparently required to complete them. The ME2 version can be built much faster.
nt
Hi John,I built a set of their Rhythm systems speakers, the basic version.
It uses the 9500 ScanSpeak tweeter and 8545 ScanSpeak carbon paper woofers. These components are generally found in very expensive commercial designs and are among the better of the drivers available.
Overall, the cabinet is very easy to build.
I took the plans down to a local Lowes that sells MDF and Ply and had them cut out all the panels.
This cost including the wood, about $175.00.I them glued them up as suggested, no problems, and finished them in piano black lacquer, not fun.
Overall I am very happy with the systems although being the perpetual tweeker, the XO in mine no longer resembles the original.
Branwell
Hi Branwell, I'm using the Rhythem XO design in a very similar speaker (same drivers, slightly different box) and was wondering what you felt needed changing/correcting and what you changed in the design. My speakers sound great but they can be a little aggressive at times (very revealing and seamingly unforgiving). I've been chasing electronic issues to correct this and am having some luck but I'm not there yet.Thanks
Steve
Thanks for the reply.I'm amazed that your local LOWES was able to cut the panels with enough accuracy that your final product came out square. Good job on their part. And good job on your part for being able to get LOWES to do the job right. I may go down and talk to my local LOWES and see what I can learn. If not, I have a table saw, but it would be easier to have LOWES cut the stuff.
I was thinking of doing the Unlimited Rhythm or perhaps the Revelator Rhythm. I'm not a tweaker when it comes to crossovers. So I think I'll have to be satisfied with the design from North Creek.
Can you comment on the sound of the Rhythm? Is the sound character similar to anything that is commercially available?
Hi John, Manx,First off, I like North Creek and I think George does a very good job.
The speakers stock are really nice and present well George’s design philosophies.
Saying that, now that I’ve had the Rhythm speakers for a while, there are several things George did that I don’t agree with.
I am not saying George is wrong and I am right.
In speaker design, within limits, there are no rights and wrongs. All speakers are a set of compromises.In my systems, the speakers have good dynamics and are timberely very nice.
Saying that, if I had to complain, I would say that they are a little light in the lower mid and the sound stage focus and depth is not as good as it could be.
There is also a hardening in the mid when played loud that I am trying to track down.
Please keep in mind that I am picking here.There are several things that I’m looking at.
One is the XO point and the other is the use of Cap “Bypassing”.
In my pre amp, one I built myself ( See bottlehead.com if you want to build a really nice tube preamp kit ), I have consistently found that using bypassing on the output coupling cap degrades the sound stage. In all cases, sticking with a single cap or a cap bundle of “same values” gives better results than “progressively lower” bypassing.
Saying that, I have found that “progressively lower” bypassing on large cap values, say over 50uf does make an improvement, but not on values under that.I want to try a single cap in the tweeter net and see if it improves focus and depth.
The next issue is one of the XO point and distortion.
The Rhythm has a very low XO point. Some where around 1700hz.While this is good for off excess dispersion and really helps out with issues related to the MTM design, it does cause the tweeter to work extremely hard and in an area where its distortion raises.
I have moved the tweeter XO up about 10% and while this has helped a great deal ( cleaner sound and better soundstage ), it did leave a 6db or so hole at the XO point which messes up the tonality of the system.
I plan to rework the bass / mid XO to better suit.In the process of doing this, the speakers have become more directional which is a negative if you are not sitting in sweet spot.
Please don’t take this as a negative against NC or George in any way.
Speakers are a compromise by nature and while a good set of compromises, George’s ideal, while close, just doesn’t match mine.
Saying that, I do feel that the drivers in the system are about the best you can get and the NC XO components are well up to the job.
For reference purposes, the rest of the system I currently have is like this.Ah! Tjoeb 99 CD player with loads of mods.
VanDenHul D-102 III Hybrid
Electronic Tonalities tube pre, lots of mods.
VanDenHul D-102 III
Counterpoint SA-100 ( updated by Mike Elliott )
Alpha Core MI 2
North Creek Rhythm speakers.I also use Magnapan MMG’s.
These planers are incredibly natural sounding on vocals and strings. They also have phenomenal sound stage depth, width and focus but don’t come close to the Rhythms in the dynamics department and are sort of directional.Any way, if I can get the Rhythms to do well what the MMG’s do well, combined with what the Rhythms naturally do well, I will be all set.
Lowes:
My local Loews has a large tubular jig that guides the saw. The cuts where totally accurate, perfect fit.Branwell
Thanks for the detailed reply.I understand you point on compromises. I have audtioned the Magnapan 1.6's and thought they had many desireable qualities, but, like you, thought they were lacking in dynamics. And while my audition wasn't extensive, perhaps a couple of hours, I thought that the soundstage was deep and airy, but a bit artifical. With the room and placement demands of the Magnapans I thought I should give greater attention to more traditional designs. Hence the North Creek speakers. Thanks again for your comments.
Link to North Creek:
Link to North Creek:NorthCreek.com
Link to North Creek:NorthCreek.com
Link to North Creek:NorthCreek.com
Link to North Creek:NorthCreek.com
The previous link worked but took you to a pet hospital. So here we go again:Link to North Creek:
NorthCreekMusic.com
Sorry for the waste of bandwidth.
must have forgoten putting http:// before WWW.
Nope, he put an extra r in North in that one. Here's the link. A suggestion for people adding links or pictures: Use the preview to make sure it works before posting it. I've caught many mistakes by doing that.
nt
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: