 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Re: Oh, Clearaudio beat me to it posted by Steve Eddy on June 17, 2004 at 20:54:01:
I had 9 of them. I found they were no better than air blatters. I would imagine there is little difference as both are springs in behavior.
Follow Ups:
I had 9 of them. I found they were no better than air blatters. I would imagine there is little difference as both are springs in behavior.Don't recall hearing about Sony proving Earnshaw's theorem wrong or overturning Gauss' law either.
You sure there was absolutely no contact between the two elements?
se
At the time I had homemade air supports and recall little difference in sound between them. It just strikes me that magnetism and compressing air would behave identically.
At the time I had homemade air supports and recall little difference in sound between them. It just strikes me that magnetism and compressing air would behave identically.In a sense they do.
I'm just trying to get to the bottom of whether or not the Clearaudio and/or Sony devices have proved Earnshaw's theorem wrong and overturned Gauss' law.
se
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
