Audio Asylum Thread Printer
Get a view of an entire thread on one page
|For Sale Ads|
In Reply to: RE: Cheap DC Filament PS posted by coffee-phil on June 04, 2017 at 16:55:37
I haven't decided yet on the best way to handle the startup surge. An oversize switcher defeats the purpose of keeping everything small. The switcher has to fit under the chassis, so its size is more critical than a filament transformer mounted topside.
I'm trying to focus more now on alternatives driven by the electrical/mechanical requirements, rather than starting with the solutions themselves. For example, let's say a raw supply (transformer-rectifier-filter) is used to provide DC filament power. That saves under-chassis space, but the output needs to be regulated down in order to create the right voltage. That's where the problem comes in. The regulator usually controls a fairly large voltage drop, often at several amps, so it gets hot and needs a heatsink. There goes the additional space freed up by locating the transformer topside. In my case, the issue is even more difficult, because I want the output to be switchable from 6.3V to 12.6V. That means the raw supply must be at least 15V, and the drop to 6.3V will create a lot of heat.
From a problem-solving perspective, the best solution might be to combine a raw supply using a topside transformer with a small buck converter under the chassis. The buck converter could be programmed to provide 6.3 and 12.6 VDC from the same raw supply, and because it's so efficient, no heatsink would be needed. The only thing is, I don't know whether the typical buck converter will start the tubes when they're cold. I'll test that on the bench soon.
Buy Chinese. Bury freedom.
Hi Triode Kingdom,
It is true the grossly oversizing will cut into the advantage of the switcher.
I sure did not want to throw a damper on this idea. There may not even be a problem. First off if the switcher just current limits at its rated current as opposed to shutting down and restarting again the voltage across the tube heaters will rise steadily with no drama. Even my 500 ma PS would eventually (tens of seconds) light the 150 ma heater. For each successive attempt the tube heater would be a bit hotter and drop a bit more voltage. If I wasn't watching the voltage rise with a scope I would have been unaware that the PS was having to make several repeated attempts to start. Actually it may have been fine. I just didn't like it.
Even if your switcher shuts down and retries as mine as opposed to current limiting there are solutions. The most obvious would be to have a series resistor limiting the current at the supply's rating and switching it out in a few seconds as Chip647 suggested.
An other approach would be to follow the switcher with a low drop linear regulator with current limiting. The switcher output would be set to the desired voltage plus the drop out voltage of the LDO linear. Linear Technology makes a variety of LDO linears.
Yes, if only one voltage is required, the combination of a switcher and LDO regulator (with current limiting) is probably the smallest package and least heat. It's also very inexpensive. The need for 6.3V and 12.6V on the same chassis changes all that. In my case, I want to be able to use 6V and 12V output and driver tubes. I also want to be able to switch between 6V and 12V versions of the same output tube. Current draw with a quad of 6V outputs will be double that of 12V tubes, so a linear regulator doesn't seem optimal for this use.
I only see a couple options here. One would be to use a separate, small switching supply for each voltage. That would require a delay circuit to be sure the supplies start reliably when the tubes are cold. I'd like to avoid that additional complication if possible.
The second option would be a power supply with at least 18 VDC output driving a DC-DC buck converter. The buck converter could reduce the voltage to either 12.6V or 6.3V, selectable by simply switching a resistor. If a linear supply is used, nothing else would be required. Use of a switcher might require a LM338 wired as a current limiter between the supply and the buck converter. The downside here is that 12.6V and 6.3V wouldn't be available simultaneously, and some of my upcoming designs will need that.
As it now stands, I'm leaning toward the use of a single supply and two buck converters to get this done. The converters are very inexpensive,
only a few dollars each, and also very small if 3A or less is needed. Either a linear supply or a small 24V/2A switcher could be used. The switcher might still require a current limiter, but it's also possible the self-limiting of the buck converters will be sufficient.
Looks like I have more experimenting to do...
Buy Chinese. Bury freedom.
or just a manual load switch. Soft-Start and stand-by are always nice.
Post a Message!
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: