|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
74.130.29.193
In Reply to: RE: Appreciate the info, but have pretty much entirely dismissed that page posted by David S. on May 11, 2017 at 14:48:57
The 801 is a different speaker. The 802 has a minimum impedance of 3.4-ohms according the B&W spec sheet for the Matrix 802 Series 3.
However, it's pretty easy to measure impedance. I measured my Thiel CS3.7 and my measurement was identical to the impedance curve published by Stereophile.
Follow Ups:
I just don't like conflicting info - especially when released by an "official source," such as the actual manufacturer.
And, yeah, the 801 is a different speaker - except for the fact that the mid/tweeter section is exactly the same as in the 802. Haven't checked the schematic on the 801 vs 802, but I believe the upper range crossover may be the same as well.
Wow, that's a little heavy handed there! That would put the full range guys in a tail spin.When ever I see filters of that magnitude usually it's "not a good thing".
Edits: 05/12/17
* sign on the specs where it stated that the speakers can only achieve this frequency response if you buy the optional external filter. This external filter gives the possibility of extending the response down to 25Hz(-3dB point) using the 6th order Butterworth alignment. This will also filter out the unwanted subsonic frequencies, which may introduce the intermodulation distortion (according to the manual).
If you look at the spec again and read it you'd notice that the speaker main crossover network that is being used is the 4th order Butterworth network.
If a thing's worth doing, it's worth doing well
(Proverb)
802 S3 specs found in the manual. It is 4th order Butterworth crossover network.
If a thing's worth doing, it's worth doing well
(Proverb)
...the 801M Series II spec states exactly as what you posted regarding crossover alignments. However...........in the discussion section of the 801 users manual preceding spec tabulation: "It should be noted that the loudspeaker may be used perfectly satisfactory without this additional [BAF] filter giving the system a fourth order Bessel alignment." In the case of the 801, the BAF is actually a S&K 2nd order HP filter with fc~20Hz and Q=2. All this is consistent with 4th order Bessel w/o BAF and 6th order Butterworth w/BAF. I assume, maybe incorrectly, that the 802 is same basic design w/diff fc.
Without the add on BAF, it is a 4th order Bessel.
My reason for posting was the glaring inconsistencies between Users Manuals, Spec Sheets, back of speaker markings, and everything else.
The B&W 801 & 802 Matrix (of various iterations) are/were some of the most widespread loudspeakers on the planet in recording studios & other technical environments. You would ALMOST think that solid data & measurements for every possible configuration would be reliably available on the internet.
...OTOH, the Internet is much overrated.
Edits: 05/12/17
Yes, they are reasonably accurate, but using a CD of various test tones & sweeps, and a crapload of alligator clips, and resistors that haven't been officially "calibrated," and mediocre multimeters, and...
Yeah - simple measurements & actual hookups/cable swapping confirm that in my particular setup, using the A&B front speaker connections to bi-amp the B&W 802 Matrix S3 (with the "A" outputs driving the mid/tweeter terminals, and the "B" outputs driving the bass terminals) not only sounds better, but is also the most stable connection (as also verified by the manufacturer of the POS (well, not THAT bad) receiver that I am driving them with.
Hey, speakers are like sausage making. If it sounds good don't ask how it's made. Just enjoy them.
When I had the 802 S2 it had the 8 ohms impedance on it as well. However, it sounded much better when I had them connected to the 4-ohm tap of my then Audio Research D-250 tube amp. I didn't need to bi-amp them as the Audio Research had enough power to make them sing properly. Although the bass response could be a little bit deeper, perhaps using the BAF would have help in this regards, but at the expense of the overall sound quality.Fast forward, I got rid of the 802 and bought the 801 S3, which I thought had a more visceral presence and well-balanced sound from top to bottom. Although they sounded similar in the upper range, but 801 surpasses the 802 in the bottom end where it went down deeper, delineated and very articulate. Also, I'm not bi-amping them as the Krell power amp that I'm using has more than enough power to make them sing properly without worrying about their swinging impedance.
If a thing's worth doing, it's worth doing well
(Proverb)
Edits: 05/12/17
Check the link below to find out how I measured mine.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: