|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
107.219.192.42
In Reply to: RE: Then... posted by E-Stat on October 18, 2016 at 07:46:23
That's a different thread altogether, but if you are talking about MQA vs. not, see any of the files at 2L.no
Click on the "test bench" button at the top.
I also learned I dislike almost everything on that site. :)
I did actually hear some differences, however based on my experience doing the snake-oil-roundabout before, and my own background, they seemed much more like mastering differences than any sort of benefit of the format itself.
My standard is something along the lines of Dolby A,B or C. All of these were clearly measurably and subjectively different than not using them. I won't search for improvements with a microscope and tweezers.
Best,
Erik
Follow Ups:
That's a different thread altogether, but if you are talking about MQA
I'm not. Click here for the reference as to how "the Mytek fixed Redbook".
I'm curious as to which CDs vs higher resolution recordings did you compare to arrive at that conclusion?
Ahh, sorry.
I was not able to directly compare a CD to high rez.
However, I can say I no longer hear the benefits of the high rez recordings.
They all sound equally good to my ears.
Unlike my previous dac, the ARC DAC 8, which always played significantly better with 96/24.
My current DAC, the Brooklyn, plays ALL formats better than the DAC 8 did at it's best.
Best,
Erik
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: