|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
108.52.163.158
In Reply to: RE: Measuring in-room response posted by M3 lover on August 14, 2013 at 14:28:37
Not to 30 or 35, so I'm skeptical, whatever meter it was.
Follow Ups:
have you voiced your concern at PFO?
I only posted the link for information. I can't verify or deny any details beyond what I've already offered.
"You can’t know what the “best” is unless you have heard everything, and keep in mind that given individual tastes, there really isn’t any such thing." HP
Why would I contact that online publication just because their claims about this speaker contradict both yours and the manufacturer's?
How strange to even phrase these facts as "skepticism."
Your suggestion sounds more like denial than a suggestion.
Hi Ktem,
1. You ask why you should contact the source for the review? It seems reasonable if you have any questions about how the measurements were made or their accuracy then that would be a logical place to raise your issues.
2. You suggest the review claims contradict my own. Please identify where I made specific claims about bass response I observed for the Janszens. I said nothing about 25 Hz and used a broad example of "30 to 35 Hz" as amazing response from a pair of 7" woofers.
3. You consider it strange to phrase some facts as "skepticism". My reply merely lifted a word you yourself used in two separate responses.
Maybe we simply need to agree we have different perspectives here, but if you don't agree with the message, why question the messenger rather than the source?
"You can’t know what the “best” is unless you have heard everything, and keep in mind that given individual tastes, there really isn’t any such thing." HP
By your logic, anyway, you ought to.No, it does not "reasonable" if I have questions about a review to contact the publication. Why would I?
Is that what you post to anyone who says anything here about a review in "Stereophile"? That they should contact them? Of course not.
You're blowing smoke, but one thing is clear: pf's claimed frequency response does not scan with what the manufacturer and other users claim. And it's not off by a mere rounding error, either. That's fact, whether it upsets you or not.
Edits: 08/15/13
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: